April 8, 2009 
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | >
April 8, 2009 NOTICE: This channel is no longer actively logged.
[00:02:27] *** Macer_ is now known as Macer[00:17:39] *** Macor has quit IRC[00:30:28] *** mrsteveman1 has joined ##nexenta[00:33:27] *** jdjustice has joined ##nexenta[00:34:28] <jdjustice> hello. can anyone tell me if new US-based mirrors are needed and what the requirements are for becoming a public mirror?[00:40:08] *** olsner has quit IRC[00:43:29] *** taltamir has joined ##nexenta[00:58:07] *** noriego has quit IRC[01:06:48] <JetForMe> jdjustice: requirements: huge bandwidth[01:07:24] <jdjustice> when you say 'huge' what are we speaking of? i have a 1Gbps connection but what are we speaking of in Mbps?[01:08:12] <JetForMe> I can't speak with any authority. I would imagine a 1Gbps connection is adequate, assuming you have no traffic costs. I have no idea how much traffic you'd get.[01:08:28] <JetForMe> I'm sure a certain amount of disk space, as well as trust, are also required[01:08:33] <JetForMe> but I'm a mere user[01:08:49] <JetForMe> you want to be an apt repository mirror?[01:09:17] <jdjustice> well i have the disk space and the connection -- i'm really looking for an estimate on average BW traffic per second..[01:09:28] <jdjustice> yes[01:09:45] <jdjustice> it looks like there are only 3 in the US[01:10:10] <jdjustice> as long as it doesn't consume the traffic of say, a full Eclipse mirror, then yes[01:11:35] <JetForMe> rootard: I think we need to make "ramdisk" and "kernel" images that are uploaded to S3 separately[01:42:09] *** koan has quit IRC[01:42:16] *** koan has joined ##nexenta[01:48:54] *** lesterc has joined ##nexenta[02:19:20] *** nprice has quit IRC[02:19:45] *** nprice has joined ##nexenta[02:29:09] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[02:44:45] *** anilg2 has quit IRC[02:46:08] *** otep has quit IRC[02:53:15] *** alfism has quit IRC[02:56:23] *** jdjustice has quit IRC[03:04:36] *** baitisj1 has joined ##nexenta[03:07:22] *** ^daedalus^ has joined ##nexenta[03:07:32] <^daedalus^> hii[03:07:52] <^daedalus^> is someone there?[03:17:20] <rootard> JetForMe: do you still have the kernel/ramdisk files?[03:17:29] <JetForMe> rootard: I do[03:17:36] <rootard> Will they work?[03:17:43] <rootard> ^daedalus^: yes[03:18:03] <JetForMe> I suppose so! I i have to figure out how to make those image types[03:19:24] <^daedalus^> hi rootard[03:20:03] <^daedalus^> i have a litle cuestion, is there any way to install the kernel in a debian lenny by packages?[03:20:33] <^daedalus^> sorry for my bad english[03:22:08] <rootard> Nexenta is built on a Solaris kernel, not a Linux kernel[03:23:06] <rootard> so the kernel image inside Debian is not very useful to a Nexenta system[03:23:56] <^daedalus^> ahh ok[03:24:30] <^daedalus^> i understud[03:38:25] *** rich____ has joined ##nexenta[03:39:36] *** ^daedalus^ has left ##nexenta[03:42:35] <Macer> well[03:42:43] <Macer> i guess nexenta is a no go on the artigo c7 based computer[03:42:56] <Macer> what a let down :) opensolaris didn't work either.. maybe they have a c7 install[03:43:05] <Macer> i'm guessing it's the kernel because all i get is a grub command line[03:50:02] <JetForMe> rootard: I gotta go to a thing tonight, maybe I'll get the images created during that[03:52:27] <JetForMe> and, sorry for the noise, but F*CKING AWESOME PIC: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d5/Shuttle_atlantis_launching_breaking_sound_barrier.jpg[03:53:09] *** JetForMe has quit IRC[04:10:55] *** tsukasa` has joined ##nexenta[04:12:28] *** Catsceo has quit IRC[04:14:01] *** Catsceo has joined ##nexenta[04:24:07] *** tsukasa has quit IRC[04:26:58] *** JetForMe has joined ##nexenta[04:40:11] <chrol> :/ I can repeatably crash nexenta using a mysql restore...[04:46:21] *** fserve has joined ##nexenta[04:50:37] *** baitisj1 has quit IRC[04:51:12] *** baitisj1 has joined ##nexenta[05:49:55] *** [JT]_ has joined ##nexenta[06:03:09] *** chrol has quit IRC[06:11:37] *** [JT]_ has quit IRC[06:24:13] *** JetForMe has quit IRC[06:38:52] *** JetForMe has joined ##nexenta[07:05:58] *** anilg has joined ##nexenta[07:06:10] <anilg> lo all[07:11:20] *** fserve has quit IRC[07:53:02] *** MrGrinch has joined ##nexenta[07:57:40] *** MrGrinch has quit IRC[08:07:03] *** anilg has quit IRC[08:18:45] *** baitisj1 has quit IRC[08:20:23] *** baitisj1 has joined ##nexenta[08:39:23] *** anilg has joined ##nexenta[09:13:24] *** andy_js has joined ##nexenta[09:34:45] *** lesterc has quit IRC[09:57:43] *** anilg has quit IRC[09:57:54] *** anilg has joined ##nexenta[10:26:21] *** RoyK has joined ##nexenta[10:31:15] *** baitisj1 has quit IRC[10:59:46] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[11:26:36] *** proteusguy has quit IRC[11:28:30] *** proteusguy has joined ##nexenta[11:51:44] *** Laevar has joined ##nexenta[11:51:59] <Laevar> hi[11:52:50] *** taltamir has quit IRC[11:53:15] <Laevar> i have trouble getting ldap client to work with an ldap server[11:53:53] <Laevar> but it seems i do not have to try get it working with the solaris ldap client[11:54:58] <Laevar> i am confused, because there is the usual "auth-client-config" but not the other packages ususally needed for this kind of setup (e.g. libnss-ldap)[11:55:31] <Laevar> the server itself is openldap[12:12:04] <Laevar> is there a way to do i on nexenta 2 rc1 ?[12:31:16] *** chrol has quit IRC[12:46:48] *** anilg has quit IRC[13:30:08] *** mib_hnxtr8 has joined ##nexenta[14:04:20] *** GHReyes has joined ##nexenta[14:10:11] <rootard> Laevar: NCP1 as an LDAP client can work but I've never done it with OpenLDAP[14:24:58] *** synan has joined ##nexenta[14:27:40] *** synan_ has joined ##nexenta[14:35:40] *** klon-immor[t]al has joined ##nexenta[14:35:53] <klon-immor[t]al> hello[14:36:14] <klon-immor[t]al> sorry to bother you with trivial question, but i cannot find anything abut it on the net[14:36:23] <klon-immor[t]al> how do i install gnome in nexentacp2?[14:39:56] *** GHReyes has left ##nexenta[14:43:54] *** synan has quit IRC[14:55:21] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[14:55:43] <rootard> klon-immor[t]al: apt-get install gnome-core xorg gdm should work I think[14:55:56] *** anilg has joined ##nexenta[15:00:11] <klon-immor[t]al> rootard: nah, it desn't work[15:00:18] <klon-immor[t]al> says somethink about unmet dependencies[15:00:30] <klon-immor[t]al> something*[15:02:12] <klon-immor[t]al> when i type "apt-get install nexenta-gnome", it reads package list, builds dependency tree, and then says "E: Couldn't find package nexenta-gnome"[15:09:11] <klon-immor[t]al> ah, finally found a solution[15:09:31] <klon-immor[t]al> first, I needed to enter apt-get -f install, and only then could install something[15:10:04] <klon-immor[t]al> heh, apt-get is really obsolete and badly designed :/[15:13:07] <klon-immor[t]al> but, i guess, it's still better than IPS[15:43:51] <devians> how insane am i in the idea of possibly migrating a zpool from opensolaris to nexenta?[15:46:40] <rootard> klon-immor[t]al: there is always aptitude[15:46:50] <anilg> devians: it should migrate fine.. it's the same opensolaris/zfs underneath[15:47:03] <anilg> check that the build of opensolaris is < 104[15:48:52] <devians> yeah its 104. im just getting the shits with it being so difficult to install software and its very limited[15:49:18] <devians> im hoping i can find a bit more of a linuxy environment with a decently solid zfs implementation[15:49:59] *** anilg has quit IRC[15:51:33] <klon-immor[t]al> devians: well, i guess by now nexenta is the only option[15:51:58] <klon-immor[t]al> or maybe, just maybe, you could try to move portage to solaris[15:52:09] <devians> urgh[15:52:11] <klon-immor[t]al> with nexenta it should be slightly easier, than with opensolaris[15:52:25] <devians> i just want a zfs implementation i can install apps on *wimper*[15:52:47] <devians> with osol it just plain hurts trying to get anything running stably[15:52:56] <klon-immor[t]al> yeah, i know this[15:53:09] <klon-immor[t]al> i've just dumped opensol because of its shitty IPS[15:53:39] <devians> all i want to do is run python scripts and a torrent client.[15:54:09] <klon-immor[t]al> but that has always been a problem with solaris - great kernel, greatest technologies, and world to crap all the good impressions[15:54:51] <klon-immor[t]al> well, then you want nexenta - i don't think you'd need all the power of portage[15:55:22] <klon-immor[t]al> and nexenta is the only half-decent opensol distro in there[15:55:46] <devians> when i got to the point with osol that i was considering writing a bash script to cron every 10mins to see if my torrent client had crashed and if it had to restart it, i figured it was time to consider a different solution[15:55:53] <devians> its down to freebsd and nexenta[15:56:11] <devians> im not sure i can move the zpool to freebsd though :/[15:56:13] <klon-immor[t]al> or gentoo/freebsd ;)[15:56:23] <klon-immor[t]al> neither i'm sure[15:56:42] <devians> ?[15:56:45] <klon-immor[t]al> zfs implementation in freebsd is a bit immature, though[15:56:58] <klon-immor[t]al> ??[15:57:29] <klon-immor[t]al> if you wonder what gentoo/freebsd is - it's like a freebsd, but with portage and gentoo toolchain[15:57:47] <devians> no i didnt understand the 'neither im sure' line[15:58:08] <klon-immor[t]al> ah - i meant, that i do not know about moving zpool from opensol to freebsd too[15:58:48] <devians> google seems to indicate their implementations are different and hence not swappable[15:59:06] <devians> so it seems nexenta is the go, but im irksome about it since its still osol[15:59:20] <devians> ive just had such a dodgy experience with osol :([16:00:27] <klon-immor[t]al> well, if you want nexenta, you probably need CP1[16:00:45] <klon-immor[t]al> i'm just experimenting with cp2, and to get working GUI is helluva work[16:00:54] <devians> i dont need a gui[16:01:05] <klon-immor[t]al> then CP2 to you :)[16:01:24] <klon-immor[t]al> yet still - apt-get IS retarded[16:01:33] <devians> just a stable implementation of zfs, and the ability to install programs like screen and rtorrent and python (hence flexget) and ill be happy[16:01:54] <devians> mate, i will be happy if i can just compile things. im happy as larry to compile[16:02:21] <klon-immor[t]al> then you should be happy with nexenta :)[16:02:40] <klon-immor[t]al> but if you really like to compile, you should probably think about nexenta/portage combo :)[16:04:41] <devians> im not familiar with portage at all. it makes me think of luggage, what is it you're reffering to? :)[16:06:07] <koan> devians: Portage is Gentoo's package manager[16:07:24] <klon-immor[t]al> yup[16:07:37] <klon-immor[t]al> it's gentoos package manager[16:08:04] <klon-immor[t]al> it's quite robust, sane, and has great dependency resolving features[16:08:23] <klon-immor[t]al> and it's about compiling packages, too[16:08:40] <klon-immor[t]al> something similar to freebsd ports, but easier to maintain and use[16:15:38] <pthread> are there any good resources for linux refugees on equivalents for common network and system commands?[16:21:06] <devians> ah k, is it possible to have such a thing on nexenta with a minimum of pain?[16:25:18] *** NCommander has quit IRC[16:25:30] <xinkeT> pthread: http://www.scribd.com/doc/2938101/linuxtosolaris-sysadmin-guide[16:25:34] *** pattwo has joined ##nexenta[16:25:41] <xinkeT> http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/sysadmin_guide.pdf[16:26:24] *** NCommander has joined ##nexenta[16:30:51] *** RoyK^ has joined ##nexenta[16:31:39] *** RoyK has quit IRC[16:32:06] *** anilg has joined ##nexenta[16:33:46] <pthread> xinkeT: yeah, I looked at that. it's a little vague. at least it's a start though, I suppose.[16:40:11] *** enderst_ has joined ##nexenta[16:44:38] <klon-immor[t]al> devians: I am not really sure[16:44:57] <klon-immor[t]al> some time ago, there was a project called portaris, but it's probably dead[16:45:29] <klon-immor[t]al> or you could contact Flameeyes for info - i know he was doing something like that with solaris, so he should know[16:46:03] <klon-immor[t]al> hell, it might be even possible to make something of a documentation on making nexenta use protage[16:46:59] *** enderst has quit IRC[16:53:30] *** RoyK^ is now known as RoyK[17:02:32] *** chrol has quit IRC[17:03:14] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[17:36:10] *** taltamir has joined ##nexenta[17:47:28] *** pattwo has quit IRC[18:03:50] *** alfism has joined ##nexenta[18:13:27] *** chrol has quit IRC[18:18:28] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[18:27:59] *** proteusguy has quit IRC[18:32:46] *** proteusguy has joined ##nexenta[18:33:50] *** wulf1 has quit IRC[18:34:10] *** taltamir has quit IRC[18:38:24] *** proteusguy has quit IRC[18:46:03] *** Fosforo has quit IRC[18:47:21] *** Fosforo has joined ##nexenta[18:59:46] *** JetForMe has quit IRC[18:59:59] *** chrol has quit IRC[19:01:00] *** alfism has quit IRC[19:19:48] *** JetForMe has joined ##nexenta[19:27:09] *** koan has quit IRC[19:27:13] *** koan has joined ##nexenta[19:30:50] *** teknoprep has joined ##nexenta[19:31:08] <teknoprep> how is nexenta stability using it for ZFS / iSCSI storage ?[19:31:17] <teknoprep> does it have any kernel panic issues ?[19:33:42] <anilg> teknoprep: those are it's strengths[19:33:47] <anilg> so they work very well[19:33:56] <teknoprep> cool[19:34:06] <teknoprep> what iSCSI target does nexenta use ?[19:34:20] <teknoprep> there are a few flavours for nix distro's[19:34:39] <teknoprep> does it do block storage or is it file based ?[19:35:06] <teknoprep> also would it be ok to install Nexenta 2 on a server for storage ?[19:35:14] <teknoprep> or would that not be good since it is not considered "stable"[19:37:42] <anilg> NCP2 is close to stable.. so it should work good on your server. Storage is on ZFS datasets[19:38:14] <anilg> i.e., you can share a ZFS dataset as shareiscsi=on[19:42:18] <teknoprep> anilg yes i know[19:42:38] <teknoprep> i was asking what the iSCSI target software was[19:42:45] <teknoprep> zfs does not share out over iscsi[19:42:55] <teknoprep> zfs only sets iscsi to be turned on for that storage[19:43:09] <teknoprep> i will look at it after i install it[19:44:50] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[19:49:27] <teknoprep> would there be a speed increase for storage over version 1.1 vs 2.0 rc1 ?[19:52:53] <anilg> yes.. NCP2 has additional iscsi improvements[19:53:12] <anilg> http://www.gulecha.org/2009/03/03/nexenta-iscsi-with-comstarzfs-integration/[19:58:09] *** chrol has quit IRC[20:05:00] *** mcasadevall has joined ##nexenta[20:19:38] *** alfism has joined ##nexenta[20:19:51] *** NCommander has quit IRC[20:22:05] *** andy_js has quit IRC[20:22:35] *** andy_js has joined ##nexenta[20:22:40] *** Bicster has joined ##nexenta[20:29:40] *** tsukasa` has quit IRC[20:35:21] *** tsukasa has joined ##nexenta[20:36:30] <Bicster> Do most modern systems just work with nexenta out of the box? The HCL is painful[20:43:58] <xinkeT> to some degrees, yes[20:45:53] <Bicster> I hope the odds are at least better than the odds of getting OS X to run ;)[20:46:31] <Bicster> I have a Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R[20:46:40] <xinkeT> I would say that would be true in most cases, providing your hardware isn't too weird[20:46:56] <Bicster> well it looks like my 3ware controller is probably out[20:47:03] <xinkeT> 3ware is definitely a no no[20:47:22] <Bicster> I guess with zfs I don't need it anyway[20:47:30] <Bicster> what fs should I move my data into for migration purposes?[20:47:33] <xinkeT> supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 is a good bet[20:47:49] <tsukasa> anything LSI based is fine :)[20:47:57] <xinkeT> yeah, that too[20:48:05] <Bicster> I'll just use ahci[20:48:56] <xinkeT> how much disk are you attaching to this? that mb has 8 sata onboard[20:49:18] <Bicster> right now I have 2 system disks in raid1 and two data disks in raid1[20:50:11] <Bicster> AFAIK only 6 of those SATA will work with solaris[20:50:29] <Bicster> "only"[20:50:31] <xinkeT> they should all work if you can make them non-raid by flashing the firmware[20:50:49] <xinkeT> bios in this case[20:51:12] <Bicster> I think 2 of the sata ports are on a sil 3512 controller[20:51:13] <xinkeT> or maybe it's already a function of the bios[20:51:50] <xinkeT> some of the sil stuff is supported, dunno about that one specifically[20:52:06] <Bicster> currently it's linux with the boot volume on 3ware and the data volume on ahci software raid (linux md)[20:52:34] <Bicster> but I guess with nexenta I can't have redundancy for the boot volume?[20:52:49] <xinkeT> you will use zfs root/boot, which supports mirrors[20:53:02] <xinkeT> that's built into the installer[20:53:23] <Bicster> ok, but will it really be bootable if the first disk fails?[20:53:52] <xinkeT> as long as your bios can boot from the second disk, yes. At most you'll need to add an entry to grub[20:56:33] *** erast has joined ##nexenta[20:56:55] <xinkeT> erast: re, how goes?[20:57:19] <erast> xinkeT: pushing 2.0...[20:57:31] <xinkeT> final, or just continuing to work on it?[20:57:40] <erast> final we hope[20:57:56] <xinkeT> nice, I've been waiting to upgrade my production machines[20:58:34] <xinkeT> did the b85 > b104 apt-clone dist-upgrade problem get worked through?[20:58:49] <erast> yes, thanks to rootard[20:59:12] <xinkeT> I still have problems doing dist-upgrades, even on machines that are running b104 unstable (just updating to the latest), but this might be because they were all upgraded from previous versions[21:10:08] <teknoprep> anilg, zfs create -V 500m tank/zvol1 needs to be changed to zfs create -s -V 500m tank/zvol1[21:10:14] <teknoprep> on the page http://www.gulecha.org/2009/03/03/nexenta-iscsi-with-comstarzfs-integration/[21:10:20] <teknoprep> this allows for iSCSI thin provisioning[21:11:48] <teknoprep> xinkeT, best practice is use Hardware RAID-1 controller with ZFS root partition[21:12:02] <teknoprep> for the root pool[21:12:05] <xinkeT> says who[21:12:28] <teknoprep> says me... and the guys i work with who have been setting up storage arrays of all types for years[21:12:46] <teknoprep> hardware raid-1 for OS... works best[21:13:06] <teknoprep> even the osol guys will recommend it[21:13:27] <erast> teknoprep: number of fixes for ZFS mirror for syspool went in recently[21:13:28] <xinkeT> you're a bit too presumptuous[21:13:47] <teknoprep> erast, thats fine... i would still put the OS on a HW RAID-1[21:14:06] <teknoprep> no i do have a few test boxes that do not have hardware controllers ... so i put ZFS mirror rpool on it[21:15:04] <Bicster> dumb question: when it comes to setting up system stuff, i.e. network configuration, boot services, and so on, is nexenta more like debian/ubuntu or more like solaris?[21:15:04] <erast> teknoprep: i would rather prefer to have flexibility of ZFS over simplicity of HW RAID for my syspool[21:15:15] <xinkeT> I have plenty of machines with hardware raid in them that I turn off, because I trust ZFS a lot more than I trust a raid vendor[21:15:17] <teknoprep> erast, what flexibility do you loose ?[21:15:58] <teknoprep> i didn't realize you loose any flexibility when the rpool is on a hardware raid-1 instead of a rpool mirror[21:16:15] <erast> teknoprep: to see how my syspool disks behaves under ZFS supervision[21:16:17] <teknoprep> you can still do snapshots... hot-swap...[21:16:33] <xinkeT> zfs can only tell you about corrupted checksums in that case, it can't fix anything[21:16:52] <xinkeT> your hw raid can lie[21:18:19] <Bicster> I haven't knowingly lost data from a 3ware raid volume yet, but just watching its behavior makes me know it can't be trusted :)[21:18:23] <erast> the less HW involved - the better, i'd say. For instance, I can get nice FMA event sent right into my mailbox when the drive in ZFS mirror failed, etc[21:18:45] <xinkeT> I have expensive hardware raid arrays that have caused silent data corruption[21:18:53] *** andy_js has quit IRC[21:19:31] <xinkeT> it was interesting to put them in JBOD mode with ZFS on top, and watch ZFS correcting their issues[21:19:55] <teknoprep> erast, do you have a script to setup FMA ?[21:20:06] <teknoprep> and drop it off to your inbox[21:20:09] <erast> teknoprep: ZFS integrated wit hFMA[21:20:24] *** andy_js has joined ##nexenta[21:20:27] <erast> i'm using NexentaStor for that[21:20:38] <teknoprep> oh[21:20:45] <teknoprep> how is NexentaStor ?[21:21:30] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[21:21:39] <pthread> Bicster: solaris[21:21:49] <xinkeT> if you want something mission critical stable with the option of commercial support, I don't think you can beat NexentaStor for features and price[21:21:52] <Bicster> thanks pthread[21:21:55] <pthread> np[21:22:12] <Bicster> I'm wondering what advantage nexenta would have then, if I am just building a NAS. If I have to learn something new...[21:22:12] <pthread> I only know because I've been dealing with the same question this afternoon. :)[21:22:30] <teknoprep> xinkeT, is it using the newer iscsi stuff ?[21:22:35] <xinkeT> it is now, yes[21:22:35] <pthread> I came to it because I wanted ZFS.[21:22:42] <teknoprep> xinkeT, in nexenta core 2.0[21:23:04] <xinkeT> it's using the iSER stack, which is the same thing in ncp 2.0, even though the userland is still ncp 1.x based[21:23:18] <teknoprep> xinkeT, ok i am going to try it out then[21:23:31] <xinkeT> that was just added in the last release[21:23:32] <teknoprep> i wanted a block level iSCSI target.. .not file level[21:23:34] <erast> teknoprep: you need to write FMA agent, "fmadm config" - to list ones[21:23:56] <xinkeT> I'm hoping the most recent zfs and cifs fixes get added soon[21:24:05] <Bicster> pthread, that's why I'm here as well. I'm just unsure if I should be using nexenta or opensolaris[21:24:05] <teknoprep> erast, i need to do that on nexentaStor ?[21:24:33] <erast> tenkoprep: no, on NCP2. On NexentaStor it is already provided[21:25:13] <teknoprep> erast, does the developer eval have any limitations other than no add-ins and 1TB restriction[21:26:02] <codestr0m> erast: are the comstar enhancement patches in the nexenta-on source you release?[21:26:14] <xinkeT> teknoprep: I used to think like you and the guys you work with concerning hardware raid, and I got burned several times. I switched to ZFS the moment it was out and I would never go back, as long as I can use *solaris. Now, if I'm stuck with any other OS, I will most definitely use hw raid[21:26:42] <teknoprep> xinkeT, you don't use nexenta ?[21:26:51] <xinkeT> I use it just about everywhere[21:27:13] <teknoprep> yeah i don't really want the web gui[21:27:15] <xinkeT> I'm switching to nexentastor for my storage systems at work[21:27:18] <teknoprep> that nexenta provids[21:27:23] <teknoprep> guess i will look into fmadm[21:28:31] <erast> teknoprep: dev edition have some open source add-ins actually.. Yes, the only limitation is 1TB[21:28:52] <erast> codestr0m: yes, and more is coming[21:28:58] <teknoprep> hey whats up codestr0m[21:29:14] <xinkeT> erast: are you still keep a page that lists patches being applied/[21:29:15] <xinkeT> ?[21:29:27] <erast> like WORM support patch will be integrated soon[21:29:31] <xinkeT> or is it all just being roled into nexenta-on[21:29:38] <codestr0m> teknoprep: hej.. how's it going..[21:29:43] <erast> all in nexenta-on[21:29:47] <xinkeT> cool[21:30:02] <teknoprep> whahts the -on[21:30:50] *** erast has quit IRC[21:31:10] <codestr0m> teknoprep: when they do actually release the source.. that's what they call it[21:31:34] <codestr0m> ON is a carry-over from onnv which is os/network Nevada[21:36:57] *** erast has joined ##nexenta[21:40:07] *** erast has quit IRC[21:43:52] *** Laevar has quit IRC[21:46:29] <teknoprep> xinkeT, what is the cost per TB of nexentastor ?[21:46:54] <xinkeT> whatever is listed on their website[21:47:01] <xinkeT> unless you're an EDU[21:47:27] <teknoprep> EDU is a huge business[21:47:32] <teknoprep> they need to stop getting discounts on shit[21:47:42] *** chrol has quit IRC[21:47:54] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[21:49:25] <teknoprep> heh i am installing a server at home... i was lazy and have it connected to my 50 inch plasma[21:49:38] <teknoprep> w0ot.. nice huge text on the screen lol[21:50:53] <xinkeT> the small center I work for inside the larger EDU is not a huge business, and we tend to lose money on the science we do for people outside the university. At best we are only allowed to break even[21:51:21] <xinkeT> they are huge businesses in the sense of the undergrads[21:51:30] <xinkeT> but not on the real science part[21:53:18] *** chrol_ has joined ##nexenta[21:55:12] <teknoprep> on the install of nexenta i am getting alot of media_error[21:55:28] <teknoprep> and te ipsecalgs service is haveing an issue starting[21:55:31] <teknoprep> over and over and over again[21:55:41] <teknoprep> trying a reburn of the cd[21:57:19] *** chrol_ has quit IRC[21:57:26] *** teknoprep has quit IRC[21:57:33] *** chrol has quit IRC[21:57:37] *** chrol has joined ##nexenta[21:57:59] *** teknoprep has joined ##nexenta[21:58:29] *** GHReyes has joined ##nexenta[22:05:52] *** RoyK has left ##nexenta[22:07:32] <teknoprep> hmm[22:07:39] <teknoprep> there is no driver for bcm5722[22:07:47] <teknoprep> well thats not good[22:08:26] *** chrol_ has joined ##nexenta[22:09:06] *** codestr0m is now known as codestr0m|afk[22:09:46] *** chrol_ has quit IRC[22:10:41] *** Bicster has left ##nexenta[22:11:46] *** NCommander has joined ##nexenta[22:13:03] *** mcasadevall has quit IRC[22:16:54] *** andy_js has quit IRC[22:17:37] <teknoprep> hmm anyone on that bcm5722 driver issue ?[22:17:41] <teknoprep> its not even in 2.0[22:17:49] <teknoprep> well thats what it said when i booted[22:23:21] <teknoprep> my new bed just arrived w0ot[22:23:26] <teknoprep> bought a termperpedic[22:23:46] <teknoprep> nexenta seems to see my network card[22:23:49] <teknoprep> so its all good[22:26:07] *** chrol has quit IRC[22:29:12] <teknoprep> hey guys[22:29:20] <teknoprep> right after installing ... i am getting errors on the tmp[22:29:25] <teknoprep> of my syspool[22:29:29] *** anilg1 has joined ##nexenta[22:31:08] <teknoprep> oh i think that was from my previous osol install[22:31:12] <teknoprep> lol[22:33:04] *** anilg2 has joined ##nexenta[22:41:04] *** teknoprep has quit IRC[22:41:36] *** __ms_ has quit IRC[22:41:51] *** __ms_ has joined ##nexenta[22:47:35] *** anilg has quit IRC[22:51:23] *** anilg1 has quit IRC[22:57:43] *** teknoprep has joined ##nexenta[22:57:46] <teknoprep> hey guys[22:57:52] <teknoprep> thanx for putting together nexenta[22:57:58] <teknoprep> whoever did it ... or whatever group[22:58:00] <teknoprep> its very very nice[22:58:08] <teknoprep> i love the linux feel with osol background[22:58:45] <teknoprep> is there an openbox repository for apt-get with nexenta core 2.0 ?[22:58:48] <teknoprep> i might put this on my laptop[23:06:31] <teknoprep> lol am i the only person here that talks ?[23:06:31] <teknoprep> w0ot[23:06:36] <teknoprep> its my own private channel[23:08:17] <teknoprep> someone chown me[23:25:24] <Macer> transformers wasn't that bad