Switch to DuckDuckGo Search
   January 30, 2010  
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | >


NOTICE: This channel is no longer actively logged.

Toggle Join/Part | bottom
[05:20:23] *** peda has joined #JNode.org
[05:27:59] *** peda_ has quit IRC
[10:49:53] *** FabienD has joined #JNode.org
[11:24:10] *** FabienD has quit IRC
[11:30:32] *** FabienD has joined #JNode.org
[12:36:39] *** rommanio has joined #JNode.org
[12:37:08] <rommanio> hi all
[13:37:43] <FabienD> hi rommanio and welcome to jnode !
[13:41:05] <rommanio> You're welcome me yet :)
[13:41:46] <FabienD> ah ! sorry, I didn't remember :-)
[13:47:00] <rommanio> I have a question: what part of jbode compile in the native code in compile (not runtime) time?
[13:47:15] <rommanio> jnode
[13:52:03] <rommanio> Sorry, it's time for eat. I see logs.
[13:53:34] *** rommanio has quit IRC
[14:15:35] *** rommanio has joined #JNode.org
[15:40:14] <FabienD> rommanio: if I understand your question, the core classes (from jnode-core) are compiled to native code at build time
[16:01:18] *** rommanio has joined #JNode.org
[17:46:52] *** rommanio has quit IRC
[22:40:20] *** galatnm has joined #JNode.org
[22:40:49] *** TravisFW has joined #JNode.org
[22:56:41] <TravisFW> i'm considering experimenting with creating a desktop environment in java using zvtm
[22:57:00] <TravisFW> i realized that jnode could possibly benefit from such a thing
[22:57:42] <TravisFW> do any problems with that idea stand out to anyone?
[22:59:33] <peda> of course not.. though you should give JNode a proper try so you are not "disapointed" about its state
[22:59:42] <peda> and hi Travis btw :)
[23:00:17] <TravisFW> hi :)
[23:00:40] <TravisFW> i've tried out jnode a couple years ago so i have an idea
[23:01:03] <peda> ok
[23:02:34] <TravisFW> i guess the main thing in my mind is that zvtm probably depends heavily on the java2d api. is that complete in jnode?
[23:02:53] <peda> yup
[23:02:57] <TravisFW> spiff
[23:03:08] <peda> but perhaps not the fastest impl out there.. ;)
[23:03:31] <peda> we just have raw framebuffer access and everything doublebuffered
[23:04:59] <TravisFW> I'm not looking for gaming quality, just usability
[23:18:05] <TravisFW> does everyone use vmware or does virtualbox possibly work also?
[23:18:35] <peda> virtualbox is very bad for jnode
[23:18:55] <peda> we use either vmware or kvm
[23:18:55] <peda> imho kvm is the fasted one
[23:20:18] <TravisFW> ok i'm new to kvm, but i'll give it a shot. don't wont to lose $80 for vmware at the moment
[23:20:28] <peda> :)
[23:20:41] <peda> well, vmware users use vmware-player
[23:20:43] <peda> which is free
[23:20:58] <TravisFW> oh i didn't know that
[23:21:06] <peda> our build system even supplies you with a vmware-player config file.. anyway, I prefer kvm
[23:21:42] <TravisFW> i'll give kvm a shot then anyhow
[23:24:25] <galatnm> i prefer kvm too. faster than other virtualization system
[23:46:45] <TravisFW> what's the command you use to start kvm with the iso?
[23:47:27] <TravisFW> it says "no bootable device"
[23:51:04] *** TravisFW has joined #JNode.org
[23:56:37] <TravisFW> i must be missing something obvious here. should i be pointing kvm at the iso download? or do I need to create another file/image and then mount the iso...?
[23:56:59] <peda> kvm -m 1000 -cdrom foo.iso
[23:57:07] <peda> is the most basic option
[23:58:44] <TravisFW> excellent it was the the cdrom argument i was missing
top

   January 30, 2010  
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | >