November 27, 2014 
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | >
November 27, 2014 [00:00:11] <CitrixNoob> since it doesnt see a physical drive mapped to F it will always try to put it there[00:00:43] <paradizelost> yes, but generally when you manually set a drive letter, esp. on a usb storage device, it should maintain that manual drive letter[00:00:55] <paradizelost> i've repeatedly changed this, and it won't stick[00:01:06] <paradizelost> it's the only customer i have that is having this issue[00:01:12] <CitrixNoob> hmm[00:03:16] *** techwave61 has quit IRC[00:13:03] *** Zax1 has quit IRC[00:13:57] <|Atum|> paradizelost: when i migrated from novell to windows i switched home drives from F: to U: (FU!) becasue i had 25000 users with that prob lol[00:14:17] <|Atum|> as far as why your drive letter isn't sticking, i dont know[00:14:22] <|Atum|> you're tlaking aboutr within a session yes?[00:14:42] <|Atum|> its probably not coming up as the same "id" or persisting it somehow?[00:25:46] *** SevenLayerjedi has quit IRC[00:36:48] *** hspcd has quit IRC[00:39:31] *** hspcd has joined #Citrix[00:40:42] *** hspcd has quit IRC[00:42:01] *** hspcd has joined #Citrix[00:43:06] *** hspcd has quit IRC[00:45:05] *** hspcd has joined #Citrix[00:49:36] *** r0vert has joined #Citrix[00:52:35] <vegbox> any fantasy football players?[00:53:26] *** vegbox has quit IRC[00:54:23] *** vegbox has joined #Citrix[00:56:58] *** gaffahiro has quit IRC[01:09:00] *** r0vert has quit IRC[01:30:05] *** Zax1 has joined #Citrix[01:40:21] <paradizelost> |Atum|: it's a usb drive plugged into a server, not through any redirection[02:20:01] *** hardlock has joined #Citrix[02:21:20] *** MartynKeigher has joined #Citrix[02:22:42] *** _hardlock has quit IRC[02:25:07] *** Zax1 has quit IRC[02:38:58] *** techwave61 has joined #Citrix[03:34:54] *** Zax1 has joined #Citrix[03:41:51] *** Zax1 has quit IRC[03:54:22] *** CitrixNoob has quit IRC[05:03:30] *** mixomathoze has quit IRC[05:04:41] *** cirrusbonsai_ has joined #Citrix[05:09:56] *** cirrusbonsai has quit IRC[05:10:02] *** bo has quit IRC[05:10:54] *** stephenh has quit IRC[05:11:24] *** mixomathoze has joined #Citrix[05:11:25] *** stephenh has joined #Citrix[05:11:28] *** bo has joined #Citrix[05:19:18] *** r0vert has joined #Citrix[05:26:20] *** hspcd has quit IRC[05:28:40] *** r0vert has quit IRC[05:32:24] *** hspcd has joined #Citrix[06:18:28] *** MartynKeigher has quit IRC[06:22:54] *** mesamoo has joined #Citrix[06:31:27] *** siddharthv_away is now known as siddharthv[06:34:01] *** chrisp1115 has joined #Citrix[06:59:42] *** mesamoo has quit IRC[07:22:03] *** r0vert has joined #Citrix[07:24:01] *** SYS_NOOB has quit IRC[07:29:57] *** Lajo has joined #Citrix[07:50:46] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[07:55:18] *** r0vert has quit IRC[07:58:43] *** kiste1 has joined #Citrix[08:01:38] *** kiste has quit IRC[08:08:22] *** kiste1 has left #Citrix[08:17:23] *** siddharthv is now known as siddharthv_away[08:37:38] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[08:53:20] *** Trixboxer has joined #Citrix[09:14:56] *** siddharthv_away is now known as siddharthv[09:22:22] *** Scorpion3de has joined #Citrix[10:32:36] *** Madden has quit IRC[10:33:02] *** klick_ has joined #Citrix[10:38:22] *** Madden has joined #Citrix[11:03:53] *** paradizelost has quit IRC[11:18:22] *** paradizelost has joined #Citrix[11:39:29] *** klick_ has quit IRC[11:48:11] *** siddharthv is now known as siddharthv_away[11:56:55] *** Lucasje has joined #Citrix[12:02:37] *** siddharthv_away is now known as siddharthv[12:15:44] <WyW> does NS VPX on VMWare support vMotion?[12:32:52] *** wmp has left #Citrix[12:43:51] *** Scorpion3de has quit IRC[13:15:17] *** klick_ has joined #Citrix[13:42:06] *** siddharthv is now known as siddharthv_away[13:42:49] *** calum_ has joined #Citrix[13:46:44] *** calum_ has quit IRC[13:55:02] *** siddharthv_away is now known as siddharthv[14:02:17] *** siddharthv is now known as siddharthv_away[14:13:34] *** Scorpion3de has joined #Citrix[14:31:59] *** GentileBen has joined #Citrix[14:42:48] *** GentileBen has quit IRC[14:59:16] *** rr has joined #Citrix[15:02:44] *** Scorpion3de has quit IRC[15:18:23] *** Lajo has quit IRC[15:32:12] <batfastad> We have a NetScaler VPX10 that we use for remote client VPN access to our datacentre. We'd like to buy another one for another site[15:32:51] <batfastad> I'm guessing it's the NetScaler Gateway product that we need, rather than the full NetScaler?[15:34:08] <batfastad> We don't need VDI or application load balancing, just the Access Gateway VPN features.[15:34:10] *** Tom_Wurm has quit IRC[15:35:03] <batfastad> How on earth does the licensing work, Platform, Universal?[15:36:14] *** Scorpion3de has joined #Citrix[15:37:12] <batfastad> Apparently we can get up to 1500 concurrent VPN users with a VPX 10. But are there any bandwidth limitations, 1500 users sharing only 10Mbps licensed throughput would not work very well :)[15:37:50] <batfastad> The site connection is 70Mbit and not really expecting more than say 30 simultaneous users[15:45:16] <batfastad> Ah turns out I was looking at this from the main menu http://www.citrix.com/products/netscaler-application-delivery-controller/overview.html[15:47:04] <WyW> batfastad: http://www.citrix.com/content/dam/citrix/en_us/documents/products-solutions/netscaler-data-sheet.pdf?accessmode=direct[15:47:20] <batfastad> Sounds like I want this http://www.citrix.com/products/netscaler-gateway/overview.html NetScaler Gateway[15:47:23] <WyW> that explains the differences between platform licenses[15:47:35] <WyW> standard / enterprise / platinum[15:48:06] <WyW> if you're using the SSLVPN feature, you'll need the universal licenses for each users[15:48:28] <WyW> and different size vpx in regards of throughput[15:50:25] <batfastad> WyW: That's all the full Netscaler though right? Since we don't use the firewall, load balancing etc, just the VPN, a Netscaler Gateway is what we're looking for right?[15:50:59] <WyW> I think it's the same appliance[15:51:10] <WyW> you just unlock different stuff with license[15:51:57] <batfastad> WyW: So a standard edition has the Netscaler Gateway SSL VPN[15:52:09] <WyW> http://www.citrix.com/products/netscaler-application-delivery-controller/platforms.html there are no separate appliance for the gw only[15:52:22] <WyW> yeah... standard + universal licenses[15:52:50] <WyW> and the VPX model according to the throughput need (VPX 10/200/1000/3000)[15:52:57] <batfastad> Different product landing page with different data sheets... http://www.citrix.com/products/netscaler-gateway/overview.html[15:53:32] <WyW> netscaler gateway is just one of the many features[15:53:55] <WyW> I think you get the load balancing stuff no matter what you buy[15:54:38] <batfastad> Aha thank you! "NetScaler Gateway is a part of all editions of[15:54:38] <batfastad> NetScaler ADC appliance, is fully integrated[15:54:43] <WyW> http://store.citrix.com/store/citrixus/en_US/pd/ThemeID.9505600/productID.201434800 that's pretty handy[15:54:43] <batfastad> with Citrix applications and is the"[15:56:06] <batfastad> There's also this... http://store.citrix.com/store/citrix/pd/productID.281256100/pgm.94596800/ThemeID.37713000[16:00:27] <batfastad> Right so I still don't understand why there are separate items in the store for Netscaler VPX and Gateway VPX[16:03:03] <batfastad> And the universal license, any idea where the pricing is for that? I use the split tunnel feature which is only covered in the universal license.[16:05:08] <WyW> I think you need to contact a partner for the prices in your region[16:05:22] <batfastad> So the VPX-10 covers us for 300 users. But I would need to buy a universal license for each of those 300 users?[16:05:32] <WyW> can't see why they wouldn't be more than eager to tell you the prices[16:05:42] <WyW> universal license is ccu[16:05:48] <WyW> afaik[16:06:28] <batfastad> WyW: what's CCU?[16:06:44] <WyW> concurrent users[16:09:02] <batfastad> If I open up a conversation with a partner I'll end up with them all over me for months. "Tailored pricing" etc, yeah tailored to how much they think we can afford[16:11:29] <WyW> haha[16:11:47] <WyW> I'm a partner but would never do that[16:14:24] <batfastad> What the heck is this thing then, http://store.citrix.com/store/citrix/DisplayProductDetailsPage/ProductID.281256100/Currency.USD[16:14:34] <batfastad> Can't we just buy that?[16:15:08] <WyW> I'd claim that's still the NetScaler VPX standard[16:15:12] <WyW> let me check[16:16:13] <WyW> uhm, ok... so it seems that you need the NetScaler VPX platform (VPX something std/en/plt)[16:16:23] <WyW> and on top of that you buy the gateway[16:16:42] <WyW> and the gateway then includes universal licenses[16:17:05] <WyW> I could be wrong with this one[16:17:15] <WyW> not a salesman[16:17:18] <WyW> but that's my guess[16:18:22] <batfastad> Crikey![16:18:54] <WyW> if I recall correctly, my customers first buy that platform license[16:19:06] <WyW> and then the "gateway licence"[16:20:14] *** Scorpion3de has quit IRC[16:20:15] <batfastad> And on a gibbous moon in the tropic of capricorn they are allowed x concurrent users lol[16:20:59] <WyW> no[16:21:17] <WyW> you can buy different size packages of those universal licenses[16:21:25] <WyW> but somehow this is all connected to the ica proxy too[16:21:49] <WyW> which doesn't require universal licenses if you're not running it in smart access mode or use sslvpn[16:22:15] <WyW> I've done many NetScaler projects[16:22:27] <WyW> and still I'm confused with this stuff[16:22:47] <WyW> I'll ask my NetScaler SE about that gw-stuff[16:22:53] <WyW> just out of curiosity[16:23:18] <WyW> it's already evening here so won't get any answers today...[16:25:19] <batfastad> Yeah I don't know the cheat codes to progress to the next level of "Buying A Netscaler"[16:26:50] <batfastad> Think I need to contact a partner to advice, add value, tailor pricing, etc. Maybe they'll chuck in the waching machine license for free, need a new one[16:28:48] <batfastad> Thanks for the info though. Was hoping this would be something I could pay for, wrap up and just get out of my queue. Getting sales involved is going to drag this on for at least a few more days[16:32:19] *** r0vert has joined #Citrix[16:45:07] *** Scorpion3de has joined #Citrix[16:48:19] *** klick_ has quit IRC[16:49:06] *** Scorpion3de has quit IRC[16:54:27] <WyW> batfastad: sent the questions... let's see what they'll answer![17:03:19] *** CrazyGuy12 has joined #Citrix[17:06:07] <CrazyGuy12> This is going to be a pretty weird question, but it is something I was courious about.... I set up the main IP adress as the management interface in XenServer, but let's say I wanted to use this primary IP adress as the public facing network on a seperate VM instead? It might not be theoretically possible, just courious.[17:07:14] <CrazyGuy12> Might be necessary to have it connected, actually extremely likely.[17:11:37] *** deunnero1 has joined #Citrix[17:14:18] *** r0vert has quit IRC[17:15:52] *** headscratcher has quit IRC[17:18:04] *** headscratcher has joined #Citrix[17:30:36] *** bo has quit IRC[17:31:53] <WyW> batfastad: ok... NetScaler GW is a separate product[17:32:01] <WyW> it doesn't include loadbalancing etc...[17:32:11] <WyW> so it's basically the same as the old Access GW[17:36:31] *** Tom_Wurm has joined #Citrix[17:51:40] *** Lucasje has quit IRC[17:56:04] *** GentileBen has joined #Citrix[17:57:35] *** GentileBen has joined #Citrix[18:06:53] *** rr has quit IRC[18:08:03] *** GentileBen has joined #Citrix[18:09:11] <batfastad> WyW: Sorry about that, had to dive into a meeting. Ah ok. Well I think that would work for us?[18:14:40] *** kiste has quit IRC[18:17:50] *** ThePendulum has joined #Citrix[18:18:30] *** GentileBen has joined #Citrix[18:19:59] <ThePendulum> GentileBen: You're all over the place aren't you[18:20:39] <ThePendulum> I've been trying to get Citrix Receiver to work on Ubuntu 14.04. Whenever I try to start it individually, it does nothing at all. Whenever I try to run or use an .ica file, Citrix Receiver -does- start but I get http://i.imgur.com/K03tQ9B.png[18:20:45] <ThePendulum> I'm not quite sure what it's getting at[18:37:32] *** deunnero1 has left #Citrix[19:29:21] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[19:30:49] *** chrisp1115 has quit IRC[19:46:35] <WyW> batfastad: I agree... you should definitely get that one for that point purpose[19:46:40] <WyW> if it's cheaper[19:47:02] <WyW> the adc brings other stuff to the table if you don't have hw load balancers for example yet[19:48:47] *** SYS_NOOB has joined #Citrix[19:50:14] <SYS_NOOB> Morning[19:57:38] *** ThePendulum has left #Citrix[19:59:17] <Grelot> Hello[20:43:47] <CrazyGuy12> CentOS 7 so old that I run PVHVM instead ov PV[20:44:06] <CrazyGuy12> Looks like I managed to steal the IP of the main dedicated and assign to a VM, it took like 1 minute...[20:44:19] <CrazyGuy12> Maximum efficiency[20:47:16] *** gaffahiro has joined #Citrix[20:52:08] *** kiste has quit IRC[21:16:13] *** xSnakeDoctor has joined #Citrix[21:31:50] *** SpideR^ has quit IRC[21:47:23] *** gaffahiro has quit IRC[22:29:17] *** huamangino has joined #Citrix[22:44:35] *** huamangino has quit IRC[22:53:13] *** hspcd has quit IRC[22:56:42] *** hspcd has joined #Citrix[22:57:33] *** hspcd has quit IRC[23:13:23] *** gaffahiro has joined #Citrix[23:52:40] *** CrazyGuy12 has quit IRC