November 14, 2014 
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | >
November 14, 2014 [00:00:18] *** qakhan has joined #Citrix[00:06:03] *** xraftx has joined #Citrix[00:21:28] *** qakhan has quit IRC[00:54:01] *** PVSISSUE has quit IRC[01:21:37] *** Lucasje has quit IRC[01:30:55] *** qakhan has joined #Citrix[01:50:19] *** xraftx has quit IRC[01:55:32] *** xtor has quit IRC[01:56:17] *** extor has joined #Citrix[02:01:31] *** Madden has joined #Citrix[02:23:38] *** xSnakeDoctor has quit IRC[03:10:37] *** MartynKeigher has joined #Citrix[04:42:59] *** Mattie_ has joined #Citrix[04:45:38] *** ironfist has quit IRC[04:45:42] *** tsifnori has joined #Citrix[04:45:44] *** Mattie has quit IRC[04:45:44] *** quaxim has quit IRC[04:46:06] *** Entil`zha has quit IRC[04:46:13] *** Entil`zha has joined #Citrix[04:46:30] *** tris has quit IRC[04:47:52] *** tris has joined #Citrix[04:49:59] *** quaxim has joined #Citrix[04:54:21] *** MasterXen has quit IRC[05:00:20] *** mixomathoze has quit IRC[05:03:32] *** MartynKeigher has quit IRC[05:10:51] *** mixomathoze has joined #Citrix[05:21:25] *** SYS_NOOB has quit IRC[05:33:43] *** qakhan has quit IRC[05:38:01] *** siddharthv_away is now known as siddharthv[06:07:39] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[06:20:05] *** Elsa-- has quit IRC[06:33:22] *** kiste has quit IRC[06:37:54] *** chrisp1115 has joined #Citrix[06:53:00] *** Lucasje has joined #Citrix[07:04:00] *** ChristophWegener has joined #Citrix[07:04:20] *** klick_ has joined #Citrix[07:04:34] <ChristophWegener> hello[07:08:30] *** stormlight has quit IRC[07:08:48] *** klick_ has quit IRC[07:09:01] *** stormlight has joined #Citrix[07:13:34] *** stormlight has quit IRC[07:17:17] *** stormlight has joined #Citrix[07:23:24] <Lucasje> morning ;)[07:24:17] *** ChristophWegener has quit IRC[07:29:10] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[07:38:04] *** Lajo has joined #Citrix[08:11:20] *** kiste has quit IRC[08:17:50] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[08:29:16] *** foogle has quit IRC[08:30:22] *** foogle has joined #Citrix[08:44:44] *** kiste has quit IRC[08:50:21] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[08:52:52] *** stormlight has quit IRC[08:53:22] *** stormlight has joined #Citrix[08:53:45] *** stormlight has quit IRC[08:53:56] *** stormlight has joined #Citrix[09:05:52] *** klick_ has joined #Citrix[09:10:10] *** klick_ has quit IRC[09:36:28] *** rr has joined #Citrix[09:51:49] <Grelot> morning[10:03:03] *** Synthbread has joined #Citrix[10:05:36] *** whoami_ has joined #Citrix[10:06:44] <whoami_> ist hier jemand?[10:07:50] *** klick_ has joined #Citrix[10:29:32] *** kiste has left #Citrix[10:29:46] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[10:31:52] *** whoami_ has quit IRC[10:37:31] *** GentileBen has joined #Citrix[10:38:02] *** Berry_ has joined #Citrix[10:38:13] *** Berry|HK has joined #Citrix[10:38:30] *** Berry_ has quit IRC[10:40:49] *** siddharthv is now known as siddharthv_away[10:49:55] <Berry|HK> we need some help while creating a backup in the CLI of the netscaler 9500 (v10). According to the documentation i should be able to do so using the 'create' command. However the 'create' command doesn't give me a system or backup/restore option. What can i do to fix this?[11:07:45] <Berry|HK> so when i what to execute the following sequence:[11:07:54] <Berry|HK> command: save ns config[11:08:45] <Berry|HK> response: Warning: The running configuration has not changed[11:09:21] <Berry|HK> command: Create system backup[11:09:30] <Berry|HK> response: ^^^^^^[11:09:57] <Berry|HK> response: ERROR: No such command[11:10:33] <Berry|HK> while pressing TAB after the CREATE command i only see[11:11:02] <Berry|HK> create cert - certreq - crl and related items... no backup or restore[11:11:07] <Berry|HK> anyone got a clue?[11:13:12] <WyW> what firmware?[11:14:15] <WyW> have you tried[11:14:18] <WyW> create system backup -level full[11:16:26] <Lajo> the backup command came in a later 10.1 build i think. So that command is not there on 10.0[11:22:46] <Berry|HK> NS10.0: Build 72.5nc (28-noc-2012)[11:22:49] <Berry|HK> nov[11:23:41] <Lajo> yeah, so if the create command is for the new type of backup then that only works on 10.1[11:23:52] <Lajo> did you find the command on edocs?[11:25:20] <Berry|HK> yup[11:25:24] <Berry|HK> too bad for us[11:25:28] <Lajo> Under 10.0?[11:25:38] <Berry|HK> i am a n00b when it comes to netscaler[11:25:49] <Lajo> You could use Command Center for backup, it's free[11:26:01] <Berry|HK> let me check that out[11:26:02] <Berry|HK> thanks[11:26:11] <Lajo> And 10.0 is a crappy ns release. Does your hardware support 10.1 or 10.5?[11:26:18] <Lajo> If it does you should upgrade[11:26:44] <Berry|HK> We have NetScaler 9500[11:28:37] <Lajo> According to this you can run 10.1 and 10.5: http://support.citrix.com/content/dam/supportWS/kA460000000CcA1CAK/NetScaler_Compatibility.pdf[11:29:25] <Lajo> So if you can I would plan for an upgrade and also look at Command Center for automatic backups of config certs etc[11:29:31] <Berry|HK> i will advice to upgrade but it a live environment without DTAP so kinda tricky, they think[11:29:49] <Berry|HK> first i will try that command center[11:29:53] <Berry|HK> thanks for the good help[11:30:24] <WyW> Berry|HK: I had a script for backing up legacy netscalers[11:30:26] <Lajo> no problem ;)[11:30:29] <Berry|HK> CC 5.2?[11:30:30] <WyW> which ran on a windows box[11:30:35] <WyW> let me see if I can find it[11:31:10] <Lajo> Yeah use the latest CC[11:31:22] <Berry|HK> i will try that[11:31:24] <Berry|HK> thanks[11:31:42] <Berry|HK> WyW: a scripted manner would be very appreciated too[11:32:33] <WyW> http://www.vmwareinfo.com/2012/07/how-to-back-up-your-citrix-netscaler.html it's that one[11:32:47] <WyW> weirdly enough it's on vmwareinfo.com :D[11:33:08] <WyW> but that NSBackup -tools is pretty straightforward[11:33:30] <WyW> http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/357935-appdna-capture-windows-2008r2-server-on-xenserver/?p=1843786 any ideas on my AppDNA question?[11:36:08] <Berry|HK> i read abou that nsbackup before thinking that was something for VMware... ;-)[11:45:26] *** siddharthv_away is now known as siddharthv[11:47:01] <WyW> Berry|HK: that's just one approach[11:47:09] <WyW> much lighter than setting up Command Center though[11:47:27] <WyW> I agree with Lajo that you should look in to upgrading to 10.1 or 10.5[11:47:40] <WyW> 10.0 isn't that great[11:50:32] *** kiste has quit IRC[12:02:17] <Berry|HK> i suggested that and the upgrade will be planned[12:02:24] <Berry|HK> first nsbackup[12:02:31] <Berry|HK> then CC implementation[12:02:37] <Berry|HK> and upgrade[12:02:40] <WyW> ok[12:02:42] <Berry|HK> thanks guys[12:02:51] <WyW> great stuff :)[12:02:55] <Berry|HK> we have a need for a quick fix[12:02:58] <WyW> see you in the other side[12:03:15] <Berry|HK> infinite....[12:03:17] <WyW> I'm not sure how CC fits the plan[12:03:41] <WyW> if you have other plans for it than backup...?[12:03:50] <WyW> then it makes sense[12:03:50] * Berry|HK from Amsterdam... btw[12:04:08] <WyW> otherwise I think backup should be sufficient prior to update[12:04:10] <Berry|HK> well the other features of the CC are also very usefull[12:04:16] <WyW> finland here :)[12:04:20] <WyW> yeah they are[12:04:33] <WyW> but if you're having an issue which requires upgrading the firmware[12:04:37] <Berry|HK> now the netscaler is set and forgotten[12:05:04] <Berry|HK> but we need to give it a little life again..[12:09:01] <Berry|HK> later dudes. lunchtime![12:10:07] <WyW> yep see ya[12:17:25] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[12:33:24] *** hirogen has joined #Citrix[12:33:30] *** kiste has quit IRC[12:34:32] <hirogen> hi there have an application running in citrix reciever and intermittantly the windows printer dissapears from the menu, any ideas as it only dissapears in this 1 citrix application and comes back usually the next day? its still exsits when we went from xp to windows 8.1 so it has to be specific issue with client users using this citrix application[12:34:41] <hirogen> the printer is in the windows control panel[12:45:20] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[12:49:20] *** siddharthv is now known as siddharthv_away[12:56:40] *** kiste has quit IRC[12:59:04] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[13:00:01] *** kiste has quit IRC[13:05:21] *** layer8 has joined #Citrix[13:09:13] <Grelot> hirogen, how the printer is mapped ?[13:09:16] <Grelot> auto creation ?[13:09:32] <hirogen> through gpo on 8.1[13:09:47] *** layer8 has quit IRC[13:09:51] <hirogen> you search for a printer and then add it from the directory[13:10:25] <Grelot> what are you using ? XA or XD ?[13:10:28] <Grelot> which version ?[13:10:56] <hirogen> active directoy?[13:11:01] <hirogen> or is that a citrix term[13:11:54] <hirogen> XA[13:11:59] <hirogen> application[13:12:34] <Grelot> xenapp[13:12:35] <Grelot> ok[13:12:59] <Grelot> its only for this application or it happen with other ?[13:13:17] <hirogen> only this appliocation we have a training version of this applciation and it doesnt go wrong[13:13:29] <hirogen> this app is used 24/7 by users[13:14:38] <Grelot> is it always happenning or sometime ?[13:14:50] <hirogen> its always happening it dissapears intermittantly[13:15:03] <Grelot> maybe its happening on 1 server ?[13:15:10] <hirogen> thats my theory[13:15:26] <Grelot> when it happens, check the server[13:15:39] <hirogen> check the server in citrix reciever right ?[13:15:48] <hirogen> on the client machine[13:15:57] <Grelot> yeah, you can check it here or on the appcenter[13:16:53] <Grelot> its always on the same printer or its random ?[13:17:21] <hirogen> it can be any of our printers[13:17:44] <hirogen> across the whole estate but having said that the application is meant to print to 1 printer only[13:18:08] <hirogen> but i think ive added other printers and the dont appear in teh application when you do file print[13:18:17] <hirogen> so its a general issue for sure[13:23:03] <Grelot> yeah, you should check if its one server messing everything[13:30:09] *** kiste has joined #Citrix[13:32:50] <hirogen> jsut found something called print detective[13:32:54] <hirogen> for citirx[13:33:46] <Grelot> not sure it will help you[13:33:54] <Grelot> it will list the drivers on a host[13:34:50] <Grelot> this is more for a driver issue / spooler crash becore of a driver[13:35:02] <Grelot> you dont know what is causing the issue yet[13:36:44] <hirogen> i dont[13:36:46] <hirogen> tbh[13:59:04] *** qakhan has joined #Citrix[14:04:22] *** qakhan has quit IRC[14:17:08] *** Bsony has joined #Citrix[14:24:02] <David62277> good morning[14:24:30] <rr> good morning to you[14:46:42] *** klick_ has quit IRC[14:53:17] *** gOODbOY has joined #Citrix[14:53:41] <David62277> uncon are you around?[15:03:39] *** rr has quit IRC[15:05:55] *** mat305 has quit IRC[15:14:53] <David62277> this place is dead this morning[15:15:01] <tabularasa> it happens[15:17:27] <uncon> David62277: i'm mostly here[15:28:30] *** calum_ has joined #Citrix[15:28:34] <David62277> uncon can you look at an email citrix support sent me about our netscaler (remember the reboot thing)[15:28:46] <David62277> http://pastebin.com/ismT4CF8[15:28:51] *** calum_ has quit IRC[15:29:05] <David62277> thing that worries me is the PCI thing he mentions[15:31:38] <uncon> god....[15:31:53] <uncon> i noticed you omitted his/her name....[15:32:15] <David62277> cant pronounce it anyways... Abhishek[15:32:38] <David62277> he never gives his last name[15:32:38] <uncon> that's more or less just a copy and paste from a tool[15:33:06] <David62277> sr is 64285087[15:34:10] <uncon> Abhishek Surve[15:35:11] <uncon> David62277: isn't this the one i already told you to upgrade for?[15:35:38] <David62277> yes and it is planned for this weekend, but if the PCI errors he is talking about refer to a hardware failure...[15:36:02] <uncon> yup, okay[15:36:04] <uncon> give me a min[15:43:59] *** Lajo has quit IRC[15:44:56] <uncon> David62277: okay, so... as i mentioned, he just copy / pasted output form an internal tool. (it's by no means even remotely designed for customer consumption.)[15:45:11] <uncon> the PCI errors should be a non-issue[15:45:19] <David62277> awesome thanks[15:47:54] <David62277> another netscaler question... is it better to have 2 physical or 2 virtual in ha?[15:48:19] <David62277> reason i ask is because i like the ability to snapshot and roll back...[15:48:51] <uncon> you so silly[15:49:08] <uncon> appliances are always better (not considering cost)[15:49:12] *** MartynKeigher has joined #Citrix[15:50:15] <David62277> is an appliance a little overkill for a company that has 300 employees and maybe 25-50max hit our XD environment from outside?[15:50:37] <uncon> probably, but it's still "better"[15:50:50] <uncon> i'm not talking cost/physical/energy[15:51:04] <David62277> youre talking performance[15:51:04] <uncon> strictly features and performance[15:51:42] <David62277> well we have to get at least one vpx for our vmware cloud (which dont ever use vmware as your cloud provider... nothing but headaches thus far) for gslb[15:52:06] <David62277> so thought why not replace the physicals here with the vpx[15:52:11] <David62277> plus the snapshot thing[15:52:51] <uncon> you can always "snapshot" /nsconfig[15:54:15] <David62277> my roll backs thus far have been when i forget to set the global gateway site back to default before upgrading... and that has been replacing the ns.conf with the backup one, and then installing the previous version[15:55:12] <uncon> firmware up/down-grades are simpl, no?[15:55:45] <David62277> yeah but i tend to usually forget about the custom gateway site thing[15:55:55] <David62277> has happened 2x thus far... lol[15:55:59] <uncon> most all important stuff is either in a RAM disk that is restored on boot or config in /nsconfig[15:58:09] <David62277> what would be your recommendation on the management interface... remember i cut it off a while back because of that loop junk? going to eventually move that colo netscaler here and set them up for ha... need management interface for that right?[15:59:03] <uncon> for what?[15:59:21] <David62277> if i have 2 ns in ha... the managment interface is needed right?[15:59:47] <uncon> "management interface" is a bit of a misnomer[16:00:05] <David62277> so the ns in ha can talk over snips?[16:00:07] <uncon> like... there is no such thing[16:00:31] <uncon> the "management interface" is just the NSIP (and possibly some SNIPs)[16:00:35] *** DotHack has joined #Citrix[16:00:36] <uncon> it's not a NIC[16:00:53] <uncon> it can be on any NIC[16:01:19] <uncon> with any other network[16:01:53] *** o0oScoRcHo0o has quit IRC[16:02:37] <David62277> oh ok cool... so id just need that 0/1 interface when first configuring the colo netscaler to be a pair with our production[16:03:21] <uncon> don't think so....[16:03:30] <David62277> so can you set the "management interface" to be on like LA/2?[16:03:50] <uncon> set?[16:04:00] <David62277> like the nsip[16:04:05] <uncon> it's not even set[16:04:10] <uncon> it IS the NSIP[16:04:20] <uncon> you can hit it form any NIC[16:04:59] <David62277> i cant ping our nsip since i downed 0/1[16:05:21] <uncon> that's your network (or your VLAN config)[16:05:28] <uncon> i do this all day in the lab[16:05:37] <uncon> nothing on 0/1[16:05:41] <uncon> single link on 10/1[16:06:06] <uncon> flat network, all IP's (NSIP, SNIP, etc) on that NIC[16:10:53] <David62277> all but LA/1 are on vlan 1 in the netscaler... maybe the port on the switch isnt allowing it[16:11:19] <David62277> is good to know though... will talk to our network guys to allow that network over the LA/2[16:12:29] <uncon> now, in a production environment, i would suggest you have a dedicated and isolated management network, but that's not a NS thing[16:13:55] <David62277> but in our environment somehow it was causing a loop... even though the port on 0/1 was set to only vlan2 and obviously the 10.2.1.xxx address isnt allowed over the LA/2 interface[16:14:04] <uncon> because it wasn't setup right[16:14:18] <uncon> not isolated[16:14:23] <uncon> IIRC[16:15:07] <David62277> so if i tell our network guys IIRC they would know what to do[16:15:12] <uncon> anyway, always blame it on the network team, right?[16:15:22] <David62277> been my experience[16:15:24] <uncon> IIRC - If I Recall Correctly[16:15:34] <tabularasa> haha[16:15:47] *** SpideR^ has quit IRC[16:16:03] <David62277> you kids and your acryomymns[16:16:13] <uncon> you're on irc....[16:16:20] <tabularasa> double lol[16:16:20] <David62277> lol[16:16:32] <tabularasa> kids? i'd dare say i'm older than most of you[16:16:36] <uncon> do kids even use IRC... i thought this was really just for 70/80's kids[16:17:32] <tabularasa> i'm nearing over the hill[16:17:47] <uncon> 60?[16:17:48] <David62277> im 37[16:17:56] <uncon> i am a kid[16:20:09] <David62277> how old are you?[16:20:31] <uncon> 33[16:20:39] <David62277> youre older than my wife :P[16:20:49] <uncon> old enough to have to use a calculator o know my age...[16:22:11] <David62277> i use an abacus[16:22:38] <tabularasa> 38 here[16:22:41] <David62277> kids and your fancy calculators[16:23:10] <David62277> so im slighty less ancient than you :)[16:23:19] <damadhatter> Detection of product '{A88973B7-EE48-4D28-8570-F7EA04DF1560}', feature 'CitrixLicensingProductFeature' failed during request for component '{D0EBE218-FC25-5A69-A95A-C5C79CC68186}'[16:23:29] <damadhatter> anyone ever seen that one, after installing a new license?[16:23:37] <damadhatter> XD 7.5[16:23:39] <David62277> restart your licnese service?[16:23:44] <David62277> license*[16:23:55] <damadhatter> I bounced the whole damn server[16:24:27] <David62277> got the host name exact caps and everything?[16:24:31] <damadhatter> i installed a new license yesterday, had issues where people couldnt login, had to reinstall 2x more and it finally took, then @ midnight last night it crapped out[16:24:33] <damadhatter> yea[16:24:43] <damadhatter> so i bounced everything and people are able to login[16:24:47] <damadhatter> but I got that message[16:24:49] <damadhatter> in the event log[16:24:53] <damadhatter> which worries me[16:25:40] <damadhatter> licesnse server shows up[16:25:45] <damadhatter> shows the correct amount of licenses[16:27:30] <David62277> upgrade the licnese server from a previous version?[16:28:59] <David62277> found this... http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/269375-publishing-apps-errors-in-event-logs/[16:29:13] <damadhatter> nah all I did was put in a new license[16:30:54] <David62277> no fix mentioned.. but one guy says he uses a powershell script to start the licnesing service if it stops[16:31:32] <damadhatter> talking to TAC now[16:31:42] <damadhatter> see what they say[16:33:14] <David62277> http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/270933-licensing-problems-with-xa6-qfarm-load-20000/[16:34:16] <David62277> http://itgerrish.blogspot.com/2011/03/citrix-licensing-error-event-id.html do you have SCOM agent installed?[16:34:17] <damadhatter> and I got an idiot[16:34:20] <damadhatter> lol[16:34:26] <damadhatter> no I dont have SCOM[16:35:27] <David62277> most things i am finding refer to SCOM agent with that event... 1001 right?[16:35:57] <David62277> http://itgeekchic.blogspot.com/2012/07/citrix-licensing-server-on-scom-2007.html[16:36:15] <damadhatter> 1001 & 1004[16:36:58] <David62277> could try uninstalling the license server, and then reinstalling using the XD 7.5 media[16:37:05] <damadhatter> yea[16:37:10] <damadhatter> i am in production right now[16:37:10] <David62277> shouldnt take long[16:37:23] <David62277> grace should kick in[16:37:40] <damadhatter> odd thing is that it wont[16:37:49] <damadhatter> immediatly kicks to expired[16:43:01] <David62277> that is weird... you should have 30 days[16:43:18] <David62277> as long as your ddcs stay up[16:43:30] <damadhatter> yea yesterday it went right to expired[16:43:34] <damadhatter> which was odd[16:43:53] <David62277> you can always check the licenses your license server thinks it has...[16:44:09] <David62277> sec i have a powershell script[16:44:34] <damadhatter> k[16:45:40] <David62277> http://pastebin.com/YNNHv0BR <-- replace LICSERVER with the name of your license server[16:46:00] <David62277> will output like this...[16:46:47] <David62277> http://pastebin.com/mykWigLD[16:48:13] <David62277> oh and you run it from your license server... might need to change your execution policy.. or you can just copy paste it into a powershell window (just be sure to change the LICSERVER to your license server name)[16:49:12] <damadhatter> hmm cant get it to run[16:49:32] <damadhatter> I havent used powershell much outside of exchange[16:50:09] <Grelot> guys, I added a retail licence to my citrix licence server but some server still display the evaluation message at logon[16:50:27] <Grelot> I have a citrix policy to specify th licene server[16:50:29] <tabularasa> did you restart the licensing service?[16:50:39] <Grelot> I even restarted the whole server[16:50:44] <Grelot> to be sure[16:50:49] <damadhatter> lol sounds like my issue yesterday[16:50:50] <Grelot> xenapp 6.5[16:52:19] <David62277> damadhatter: open powershell as administrator... set-executionpolicy unrestricted[16:52:33] <David62277> and then try to run the script[16:52:51] <damadhatter> okay I got it to work[16:53:01] <damadhatter> i ran it through the powersehll ISE[16:53:06] <damadhatter> shows 59% used[16:53:37] <damadhatter> thank you for that script btw[16:53:47] <David62277> so it is giving out licenses... are you concurrent or user/computer?[16:53:54] <damadhatter> concurrent[16:54:06] <damadhatter> i think everything is good[16:54:23] <damadhatter> just those messages are odd[16:54:44] <David62277> when you have some down time id uninstall/reinstall the licensing server just to be sure[16:54:52] <damadhatter> yea not a bad idea[16:55:03] <damadhatter> I am likley going to upgrade to 7.6 here shortly[16:55:11] <damadhatter> so i know that needs a new licensing server right?[16:55:12] <tabularasa> Grelot: the licensing server, or the XA server?[16:55:15] <David62277> yep[16:55:24] <damadhatter> im just afriad because I finsally got 7.5 stable after 4 months[16:55:29] <David62277> new version for 7.6[16:55:37] <David62277> which id stay away from as it is so new[16:55:44] <damadhatter> lol[16:55:46] <David62277> no hotfixes or anything out for it yet[16:55:51] <damadhatter> 7.6?[16:55:56] <damadhatter> or the licensing server?[16:56:03] <Grelot> I restarted both[16:56:04] <David62277> 7.6[16:56:08] <damadhatter> I was going to install 7.6 mid decemeber[16:56:22] <Grelot> the licence server and the server that had the error message[16:56:25] <damadhatter> let everyone else work out the bugs lol[16:57:11] <tabularasa> Grelot: do the liecnses show up in the admin console of the license server?[16:57:20] <David62277> yeah thats what i usually do with new releases... also look through the community forums on 7.6... might be issues people have run into[16:58:08] <damadhatter> yea[16:59:20] *** kiste1 has joined #Citrix[17:00:03] <David62277> grelot: might be the hostname? licenses won't work if the hostname doesn't match exactly with what you put in with citrix... caps and all[17:00:38] <Grelot> If it was the hostname, the problem would be on all servers[17:00:42] <Grelot> its just on some[17:00:55] <Grelot> yeah they take licences[17:01:06] <David62277> they not getting the policy?[17:01:20] <Grelot> but I need to check if the server that have the error message grab a licence also[17:01:27] <David62277> can check the registry under hklm\software\policies\citrix (i think)[17:01:32] <Grelot> I also tried with a local policy David62277[17:01:48] <Grelot> I'm gonna check the registry ok[17:02:17] *** kiste has quit IRC[17:02:52] <David62277> compare the registry between working/non-working[17:03:18] <Grelot> i'm gonna look for the key[17:03:21] <Grelot> good idea[17:03:52] <David62277> i dont have an XA 6.5 farm to go against so i can't give you the exact path... but id imaging it is ...\policies\citrix\licensing or something like that[17:03:53] <Grelot> its licconfig ?[17:04:26] <David62277> google says yes[17:04:39] <Grelot> cool thanks, i'm gonna check[17:05:19] *** Bsony has quit IRC[17:06:09] <David62277> HKLM\Software\Policies\Citrix\Ima\Licensing[17:06:30] <David62277> should have LicenseServerHostName and LicenseServerPortNumber[17:06:33] <David62277> under it[17:07:52] <David62277> tabularasa... did you see me rambling about citrix policies not showing up correctly in gpmc (settings tab) the other day?[17:10:01] <Grelot> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Citrix\Licensing[17:10:23] <David62277> you're looking at your app servers right?[17:10:48] <Grelot> yes[17:12:06] *** xSnakeDoctor has joined #Citrix[17:13:17] <David62277> if it is set by policy it really should be under the policies key... id think[17:20:05] <|Atum|> hiyo[17:24:17] <David62277> so the gmpc thing i found a fix... i was always able to see the citrix policies when i opened gpmc from a ddc, highlighted the policy, and clicked on the settings tab before upgrading XD to 7.1 (from 7.0). after the upgrade i would only see the microsoft policies... unless i actually opened the gpo for editing... then i would see the citrix policies[17:24:52] <David62277> which i find just looking at the settings much easier to read. anyways, i just ended up uninstalling gpmc and reinstalling it on the ddcs[17:25:19] <David62277> then under the settings tab all the citrix policies are listed along with the microsoft[17:34:20] *** Glanzmann has joined #Citrix[17:35:35] <Glanzmann> uncon: I upgraded our mpx7500 from the latest 10.1 to 10.5 and I get an Http/1.1 Internal Server Error 43526. I assume that this is related with not able to connect the storefront?[17:37:30] *** pigram86 has joined #Citrix[17:37:39] <uncon> Glanzmann: "Internal Server Error 43526" ?[17:38:26] *** pigram86 has quit IRC[17:38:31] <Glanzmann> No Joke.[17:38:40] <Glanzmann> I send you a diff of the config[17:38:40] <uncon> who's reporting that?[17:38:44] <Glanzmann> Netscaler[17:38:49] <Glanzmann> I'm sending you a screenshot[17:38:50] <uncon> you sure about that?[17:38:53] <uncon> k[17:41:14] <uncon> Glanzmann: looks like a radius challenge issue[17:41:42] *** Synthbread has quit IRC[17:41:43] <Glanzmann> We do radius.[17:41:54] <Glanzmann> But the access challenge went through ok[17:42:07] <Glanzmann> I have username / password / ACCESS CHALLENGE > SMS > CHALLENGE.[17:42:13] <Glanzmann> Let me try mobile receiver.[17:43:27] <Glanzmann> Mobile receiver still works.[17:43:32] <Glanzmann> Over the same radius server.[17:44:08] <uncon> i don't see anything in the config...[17:44:25] <Glanzmann> Should I send you the full config before and after?[17:44:27] <uncon> nor any record of that error number[17:44:49] <Glanzmann> uncon: That is only the diff between the old config and the new config. I ran sort before in order to minimize deltas.[17:45:47] <Glanzmann> uncon: http://www.cjharms.info/2014/10/netscaler-gateway-internal-server-error.html[17:45:54] <Glanzmann> That is the same error that I had.[17:46:13] <Glanzmann> Funny think is I had it before in that field, than citrix support told me to change it because of a regression they build in.[17:46:20] <Glanzmann> Now I have to put it back it seems.[17:46:27] <uncon> Glanzmann: from the shell: cat /tmp/aaad.debug[17:46:42] <Tom_Wurm_> anyone know a good way / is it possible for xenapp 6.5 to show me what powershell it ran every time i do something in the GUI?[17:47:06] <Glanzmann> uncon: I know that it is not radius, but I verify just to be sure.[17:47:39] <uncon> well, that's where it stops... so, we should confirm that it completes[17:48:13] <David62277> tom... far as i know... no[17:48:17] <David62277> what are you trying to do?[17:48:53] <uncon> Glanzmann: is that blog post the same as your issue?[17:49:00] <Glanzmann> Yes.[17:49:10] <uncon> so, it's resolved now?[17:49:11] <Glanzmann> send_accept in aaad.debug[17:49:19] <Glanzmann> Give me one second I have to try it.[17:49:22] <Glanzmann> And report back in a second.[17:49:24] <Glanzmann> I'm slow.[17:55:37] <Glanzmann> uncon: I just checked the settings and it is already in the way cjharms describes it his block article.[17:55:48] <uncon> k[17:56:02] <Glanzmann> So it is not resolved.[17:59:21] <Glanzmann> I hit the right session policy.[18:02:57] *** hirogen has quit IRC[18:04:13] *** DotHack has quit IRC[18:04:44] <Glanzmann> uncon: It is resolved.[18:05:07] <Glanzmann> It was what cjharms had at his block.[18:05:12] <Glanzmann> I looked at the wrong session policy[18:06:35] *** stoney66 has joined #Citrix[18:08:21] <uncon> cool[18:08:35] <uncon> well, now it's configured how it's supposed to be (:[18:08:37] *** kiste1 has quit IRC[18:08:39] <|Atum|> Neat, in flight texting "free" with TMO[18:10:02] <Glanzmann> I always had it that way until Citrix support told me I had to change it because a regression they build into netscaler.[18:10:03] <|Atum|> Has anyone here seen the RSA Adaptive authentication? It's not compatible at all with receiver policies right? (sets a cookie after you answer the enhanced prompts)[18:16:32] *** MartynKeigher has quit IRC[18:27:48] <Glanzmann> uncon: Any idea why I don't have Perfect Forward Secrecy but have dhparam enabled on netscaler?[18:41:45] <Glanzmann> uncon: Thanks for the help.[18:41:49] <Glanzmann> l8er[18:41:50] *** Glanzmann has quit IRC[18:57:02] *** LouPetridish has joined #Citrix[18:57:07] <LouPetridish> Hello everyone[18:57:41] <LouPetridish> Is it possible to change the path of a published application in 7.x?[18:58:10] <|Atum|> Yes, right click the app, properties, location, path to the executable[18:58:12] <David62277> yes... as long as the path has actually changed[19:03:26] <LouPetridish> it has[19:04:07] <LouPetridish> I pathed to the executable through the app that was already published hoping it would redirect the app to the new server but that isn't working[19:04:35] <LouPetridish> Was hoping of doing it quietly in the back so my users wouldnt get hit with errors that the app is no longer available[19:06:05] <|Atum|> ahhh[19:06:16] <|Atum|> you're talking about apps that have already been subscribed?[19:06:22] <LouPetridish> Yes[19:06:27] <|Atum|> a couple of options[19:07:07] <|Atum|> you can export the subscriptions from storefront, remove all the subscriptions for that app, reimport the subscriptions, then use something like AUTO to auto subscribe it again[19:07:26] <|Atum|> or you can push the regkey that suppresses the "no longer available" prompt[19:07:33] <|Atum|> if you have domain joined machines that is[19:07:38] <|Atum|> or otherwise managable[19:07:58] <|Atum|> remove the app, then add a new app[19:08:21] <LouPetridish> yeah i am trying to do it so the user doesnt notice. because im going to get a lot of complaining[19:08:50] <|Atum|> havent tried this, but you maybe could try a symlink in the old path[19:08:55] <|Atum|> like[19:08:56] <Splatone> Morning.[19:09:03] <LouPetridish> Hi Splatone[19:09:08] <|Atum|> C:\program files\OldPath(=>NewPath)[19:09:11] <Splatone> er afternooon.[19:09:16] <LouPetridish> Yeah that 2[19:09:18] <|Atum|> It would have to be on the same volume ofc[19:09:21] <|Atum|> hi Splatone[19:09:32] <LouPetridish> Okay want the full story?[19:09:35] <|Atum|> sure[19:09:41] <LouPetridish> I moved vcenters and now im screwed[19:09:43] <Splatone> |Atum| I found the fix to the issue I had with HRP4 on XA65 with default printer policy issues.[19:09:50] <Splatone> ended up being a MS hotfix.[19:09:58] <LouPetridish> so the machine catalog won't update my existing machines and won't let me spin new ones out[19:10:16] <LouPetridish> so what I did say I had machine test1, test2, test3, and test4[19:10:21] <LouPetridish> i deleted first 2 machines[19:10:42] <LouPetridish> recreated a new machine catalog on the new vcenters hosting/resource so it can actually see everything okay again[19:10:49] <|Atum|> Nice Splatone what hotfix[19:11:07] <|Atum|> ah, renamed or migrated MCS resources?[19:11:09] <LouPetridish> spun up test1, and test2 on the new vcenter[19:11:36] <LouPetridish> recreated the mcs resources from gold images[19:11:56] <LouPetridish> so now i have machine catalogA with test3 and test4[19:12:04] <LouPetridish> and machine catalogB with test1 and test2[19:12:28] <Splatone> |Atum| http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2927901[19:12:31] <LouPetridish> need to find out how i can leave apps subscribed to users but move them from catalogA to CatalogB then spin up test3 and test4[19:12:50] <|Atum|> LouPetridish: apps arent subscribed to machine catalogs[19:12:52] <|Atum|> only delivery groups[19:13:01] <|Atum|> you can add the new machines to the same delivery group[19:13:02] <LouPetridish> okay sorry[19:13:31] <|Atum|> likewise, you can also make apps members of 2 delivery groups using powershell[19:13:37] <LouPetridish> yeah but that delivery group is linked to the bad machine catalog[19:13:43] <|Atum|> No[19:13:47] <LouPetridish> which the bad host/resrouces[19:13:58] <LouPetridish> no?[19:13:58] <|Atum|> delivery group isnt linked to machine catalog in any way, it only contains machines which are in a machine catalog[19:14:08] <|Atum|> LouPetridish: spin up a new machine in the good catalog[19:14:14] <|Atum|> right click the OLD delivery group[19:14:15] <|Atum|> add machines[19:14:19] <|Atum|> add the new machine[19:14:24] <|Atum|> => working.[19:14:27] <|Atum|> once you have a valid machine[19:14:33] <|Atum|> remove the broken ones from that delivery group[19:14:40] <|Atum|> then delete the broken machine catalog[19:15:56] <LouPetridish> okay so go into new machine catalog and add machines right[19:15:58] <LouPetridish> ??[19:16:13] <LouPetridish> then go into old delivery group and say hey i want these machines added to this delivery group?[19:17:01] <|Atum|> yep[19:17:03] <LouPetridish> shit if your right[19:17:07] <LouPetridish> then all of this stress was for nothing[19:17:10] <|Atum|> This way you dont mess with their subscriptions[19:17:12] <LouPetridish> been shitting breaks for days now[19:17:13] <|Atum|> Yep :D[19:17:55] <David62277> only time it becomes a pita is when you're talking about MCS desktops... then you have to powershell[19:17:57] <|Atum|> Its important to understand hte concept that machines are completely separate from delivery[19:18:32] <David62277> but you have to do that anyways when you update the base image...[19:19:14] <LouPetridish> yeah its a very important concept and your right because it doesn't matter what machine catalog you add machines[19:19:26] <LouPetridish> when you go into any delivery group it shows those machines, its up to you to select the right ones[19:23:22] <LouPetridish> Hi David, yeah I havent had to work with MCS desktops that much yet but im sure I will have happy times with that sooner or later[19:25:24] <LouPetridish> HOLY $hit dude[19:25:29] <LouPetridish> you just saved me so much time[19:25:29] <LouPetridish> it worked[19:25:38] <LouPetridish> time and work and tears[19:25:46] <LouPetridish> and an ass whooping from management[19:28:22] <|Atum|> here here[19:31:24] *** xraftx has joined #Citrix[19:33:29] <LouPetridish> Thank you so much Atum[19:37:12] <|Atum|> np[19:42:07] *** xraftx_ has joined #Citrix[19:44:10] *** xraftx has quit IRC[19:49:17] *** stormlight has quit IRC[19:49:43] *** stormlight has joined #Citrix[19:50:15] *** _hardlock has joined #Citrix[19:53:54] *** hardlock has quit IRC[19:54:42] *** stormlight has quit IRC[20:15:02] *** xSnakeDoctor has quit IRC[20:24:23] *** GentileBen has quit IRC[20:24:53] *** stoney66 has quit IRC[20:26:50] *** MartynKeigher has joined #Citrix[20:35:02] <|Atum|> I'm not sure what would be easier for a development organization: starting over for fixing what they've got...but the XM MDM install leaves a lot to be desired.[20:36:58] *** stormlight has joined #Citrix[20:41:37] *** Lucasje has quit IRC[20:43:03] *** stormlight has joined #Citrix[20:59:20] *** xSnakeDoctor has joined #Citrix[21:14:38] *** JoeX has joined #Citrix[21:15:04] *** stormlight has quit IRC[21:15:16] <JoeX> Anyone ever configured a wyse thin client for XD?[21:15:30] *** stormlight has joined #Citrix[21:20:17] *** stormlight has quit IRC[21:20:55] <xraftx_> hello JoeX , only a couple of times[21:21:09] <xraftx_> what do you need to know?[21:25:48] <JoeX> I just got these wyse t50 terminals, no idea how to configure it. We have the older models[21:26:19] <JoeX> Seems like the new wyse terminals come with a version of ubuntu[21:35:32] *** gaffahiro has joined #Citrix[21:46:33] *** deunnero has left #Citrix[21:52:09] <xraftx_> depend on the model[21:52:40] <xraftx_> but I have 2 models of wyse, and have noproblems at the configuration time[22:00:43] *** gaffahiro has quit IRC[22:13:07] *** xraftx_ has left #Citrix[22:17:47] *** gOODbOY has quit IRC[22:35:40] *** JoeX has quit IRC[23:12:37] *** chrisp1115 has quit IRC[23:48:18] *** deunnero has joined #Citrix[23:50:27] *** MartynKeigher has quit IRC[23:56:00] *** gaffahiro has joined #Citrix