Switch to DuckDuckGo Search
   February 22, 2012  
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | >

Toggle Join/Part | bottom
[00:00:38] *** cmatheson has quit IRC
[00:02:52] <Diranged> ok so i guess im wondering how i can allow mail relaying to any domain, if a user comes in with a certificate that is signed by the same root CA as our server cert
[00:07:52] *** e-anima has quit IRC
[00:09:10] <Patrickdk> google it :)
[00:09:57] <Diranged> gee thanks for the help..
[00:10:46] <Patrickdk> http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#server_tls
[00:10:51] <Patrickdk> well, I dunno what more you want
[00:10:59] <Patrickdk> your asking questions like you NEVER READ A MANUAL
[00:11:13] <Patrickdk> in that case the only answer you will get is read the damned manual
[00:12:21] <Diranged> Patrickdk: Thanks for being a dick about it.. really appreciate that. I am reading that manual, but there are literally hundreds of different possible configuration options depending on what I'm trying to do. I thought that you guys might be able to interpret my goals and help me with the answer a little bit faster than reading that huge ass doc. Apparently not, so thats fine.. I'll go read the doc and figure it out myself.
[00:12:28] *** Diranged has left #postfix
[00:17:12] *** pexapor has joined #postfix
[00:18:56] *** tolkor has quit IRC
[00:21:04] <mac-> hey
[00:21:57] <mac-> I wish to give my users my certificate to import into windows what will remove this silly warning from i.e. Outlook
[00:22:48] <mac-> then I should give them this cert which is set as smtpd_tls_cert_file ?
[00:23:16] <rob0> they need the CA cert that signed it
[00:23:23] <Patrickdk> normally
[00:23:29] <Patrickdk> if it's selfsigned, heh
[00:26:22] <mac-> well I gave them cert which is set as smtpd_tls_CAfile
[00:26:30] <mac-> but it didn't work
[00:26:53] <mac-> when send them cert from smtpd_tls_cert_file warning disappeard
[00:27:27] <rob0> did the CA sign the server cert?
[00:27:39] <mac-> no its self-signed
[00:28:00] <rob0> so, you found your answer, I guess
[00:28:06] <Patrickdk> if it's selfsigned how do you have a ca certificate?
[00:28:19] <Patrickdk> or well, something in smtpd_tls_cafile
[00:29:11] <mac-> hmm
[00:29:49] <mac-> is there any windows list of official CAs wher should I add my own CA ?
[00:30:26] <Patrickdk> selfsigned != ca
[00:30:45] <Patrickdk> if you have a ca, then yes
[00:32:36] <mac-> hm well finally I should import both certs - of my server, and of my CA ?
[00:33:08] <mac-> by 'my CA' I undestand this one which I've geberated by myself
[00:34:42] *** krzee has quit IRC
[00:45:19] *** v|nc3 has quit IRC
[00:54:11] *** krzee has joined #postfix
[00:55:10] *** n0sq has joined #postfix
[00:57:38] *** kjs has quit IRC
[00:57:38] *** kjs has joined #postfix
[01:02:15] *** jiffe98 has joined #postfix
[01:03:39] <jiffe98> is it possible to deliver mail based on a field in the message header?
[01:05:21] <adaptr> define "deliver based on"
[01:06:01] <adaptr> postfix routes mail based on the recipient and/or sender address, primarily
[01:07:11] <jiffe98> our mail filter can send a copy of all mail to a specific email address, the message is intact except a couple headers it adds to indicate who the original recipient was, I want to deliver to the local mailbox for that original recipient
[01:07:50] <adaptr> wrong way around
[01:08:07] <adaptr> first split off a copy based on the original recipient, then deliver to the filter
[01:08:17] <adaptr> !recipient_bcc_maps
[01:08:17] <knoba> adaptr: "recipient_bcc_maps" : a configuration parameter in the main.cf: Optional BCC (blind carbon-copy) address lookup tables, indexed by recipient address. The BCC address (multiple results are not supported) is added when mail enters from outside of Postfix.
[01:08:45] <jiffe98> this is for incoming mail
[01:08:47] <jiffe98> it hits the filter first
[01:08:49] <adaptr> (no idea why you think yuo need a "custom mail filter" to do that)
[01:08:54] <adaptr> jiffe98: wanna bet ?
[01:09:06] <Patrickdk> I don't get why you want two copies
[01:09:19] <jiffe98> adaptr: the filter is not a box we control, this is before it ever hits our postfix machines
[01:09:21] <Patrickdk> I mean, what happens to the *non* copy?
[01:09:25] <jiffe98> we don't control I mean
[01:09:29] <adaptr> jiffe98: yuo shouold have mentioned this before
[01:09:43] <adaptr> anyway, sounds like milter time
[01:10:12] <jiffe98> ok
[01:10:22] <adaptr> !milter
[01:10:22] <knoba> adaptr: "milter" : Postfix support for Sendmail milters: http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html
[01:10:27] <adaptr> have a read through that
[01:10:48] <adaptr> people commonly use it for stuff like dkim signing, so you can do pretty much whatever
[01:11:06] <rob0> whatevs
[01:11:10] <adaptr> indeedy
[01:11:16] <adaptr> yo
[01:23:04] *** master_of_master has quit IRC
[01:24:19] *** master_of_master has joined #postfix
[01:36:22] *** kjs has left #postfix
[01:44:19] *** kloeri_ is now known as kloeri
[01:53:30] *** jkfod has quit IRC
[02:02:16] *** tolkor has joined #postfix
[02:03:38] *** pexapor has quit IRC
[02:20:27] *** pexapor has joined #postfix
[02:22:56] *** tolkor has quit IRC
[02:26:57] *** MaximusColourum has quit IRC
[02:28:03] *** MaximusColourum has joined #postfix
[02:28:25] *** nutron has joined #postfix
[02:32:28] *** MaximusColourum has quit IRC
[02:43:59] *** BuenGenio has joined #postfix
[02:47:48] <Tabmow> tmberg: amavis can do that if you are already using it
[02:59:35] *** krm- has joined #postfix
[03:01:23] *** pexapor has quit IRC
[03:01:52] *** pexapor has joined #postfix
[03:02:27] <krm-> in the case that virtual_alias_maps expands a NOTIFY=SUCCESS recipient to > 1 recipient, there's supposed to be an "alias expanded" DSN. I don't seem to get them, or have ever seen them....anyone else seen one?
[03:06:46] *** Diranged has joined #postfix
[03:08:37] <Diranged> I've got a DKIM filter setup and working when we send email from the localhost (whether we use 'mail'.. or we just telnet to the local SMTPD service). However, when we send email from a remote server, we get a brief DKIM header but its not actually signed. Looking at the docs it mentions 'They are typically used to filter unwanted mail, and to sign mail from authorized SMTP clients' … but its unclear whether this means th
[03:09:02] *** krm- has left #postfix
[03:13:17] <seekwill> What do you mean "brief DKIM header but its not actually signed"?
[03:17:41] <Diranged> "X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 ourmailer.com 371F16017E"
[03:19:21] *** Bry8Star has joined #postfix
[03:32:25] *** hever has joined #postfix
[03:43:00] <Diranged> no ideas i guess..
[03:43:20] <Diranged> im wondering if theres something different about how the communication between the dkim-filter is handled with a remote client vs a local client..
[03:44:02] <jimpop> not really a #postfix issue... but which dkim filter are you using?
[03:48:10] <Diranged> dkim-filter
[03:48:14] <Diranged> (not opendkim)
[03:48:51] <jimpop> how do you have it implemented with postfix?
[03:48:52] *** krzee has quit IRC
[03:51:24] *** krzee has joined #postfix
[03:51:44] <jimpop> and does dkim-filter.conf:InternalHosts reference all the right things?
[03:52:31] <Diranged> hmm ill take a closer look at that
[03:56:32] <rosco_`> the maintenance is over without harm, thanks for your advice guys!
[03:59:24] *** rosco_` has quit IRC
[04:11:05] <Diranged> hmm i added 0.0.0.0/0 to the internal hosts file and it had no change in the dkim behavior..
[04:11:35] *** nowthatsamatt has joined #postfix
[04:11:36] *** krzee has quit IRC
[04:13:10] *** nowthatsamatt has left #postfix
[04:14:30] <jimpop> i'm not sure if InternalHosts can be set to 0.0.0.0/0
[04:14:51] <jimpop> perhaps try asking in #dkim or on the dkim-milter mailinglist
[04:15:01] *** krzee has joined #postfix
[04:15:40] <jimpop> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
[04:29:20] *** higuita has joined #postfix
[04:29:35] <Diranged> yeah there is really no #dkim.. but yah, im struggling with the InternalHost section..
[04:33:28] *** krzee has quit IRC
[04:45:21] *** krzee has joined #postfix
[05:31:48] *** n0sq has quit IRC
[05:34:31] *** MAAAAD has joined #postfix
[05:34:42] *** JoKoT3 has quit IRC
[05:34:49] *** JoKoT3 has joined #postfix
[05:37:10] *** MAAAAAD has quit IRC
[06:46:28] *** danblack has joined #postfix
[06:51:41] *** Diranged has quit IRC
[07:03:14] *** krzee has quit IRC
[07:16:35] *** FainaUkraina has joined #postfix
[07:19:12] *** BuenGenio has quit IRC
[07:30:23] *** samlt has joined #postfix
[07:30:35] *** danblack has quit IRC
[07:46:31] *** alcy has joined #postfix
[07:54:18] *** krzee has joined #postfix
[07:54:40] <alcy> folks, how does one get the sender address from the logs in case of 5XXs/RCPT TO errors ? should I track the queueid to get this ?
[08:01:46] *** FainaUkraina has quit IRC
[08:06:29] <jimpop> grep "dsn=5" /var/log/mail.log
[08:09:23] <alcy> what if they are disabled ?
[08:10:02] *** BuenGenio has joined #postfix
[08:14:04] *** npmapn has joined #postfix
[08:15:15] <jimpop> huh?
[08:15:28] <jimpop> the logs shouldn't be disabled
[08:16:52] <alcy> no i got confused with the smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords setting, sorry
[08:23:30] <alcy> jimpop: but grerping for dsn=5 only gives the recipient address
[08:26:48] <jimpop> alcy: ah, yes. missed that part of the requirement
[08:27:31] <jimpop> the only way I know of would be to grep for the dsn=5, then parse out the queueID and grep the queueID in the log
[08:28:33] <alcy> k, thx
[08:32:54] <samlt> hello, in the log I can see postfix master process reloading its configuration with no apparent reason:
[08:33:01] <samlt> postfix/master[1665]: reload -- version 2.8.7, configuration /etc/postfix
[08:33:06] <samlt> last reload are 16:09:41 16:09:42 16:10:00, it's local time it gives you an idea
[08:33:11] <samlt> Anything I should check?!
[08:33:40] <samlt> those last reload are from yesterday actually(already asked that question here)
[08:34:23] <samlt> but it can happen several time per minutes and some other time no reload for a while
[08:35:44] *** wdp has joined #postfix
[08:36:22] *** alcy has quit IRC
[08:37:04] *** BuenGenio has quit IRC
[08:37:06] *** alcy has joined #postfix
[08:37:13] *** d3c_ has joined #postfix
[08:45:17] *** jyryt has joined #postfix
[08:45:53] *** krzee has quit IRC
[08:47:20] *** pexapor has quit IRC
[08:48:00] <jimpop> samlt: postfix will do that automatically if some of the files in /etc/postfix change (i.e. map files, aliases, etc)
[08:49:58] *** BuenGenio has joined #postfix
[08:52:07] *** Motoko has quit IRC
[08:54:56] *** krzee has joined #postfix
[08:54:56] *** krzee has joined #postfix
[09:01:51] *** matt1982 has joined #postfix
[09:09:31] *** BuenGenio has quit IRC
[09:11:02] *** GieltjE has joined #postfix
[09:12:29] *** aindilis2 has quit IRC
[09:13:24] <samlt> jimpop, strange, none of the files has change for at least 5days
[09:22:53] *** BuenGenio has joined #postfix
[09:31:58] *** SelfishMan has quit IRC
[09:32:15] *** SelfishMan has joined #postfix
[09:32:40] *** e-anima has joined #postfix
[09:34:35] *** breaker313 has joined #postfix
[09:35:48] *** jyryt has quit IRC
[09:36:14] *** jyryt has joined #postfix
[09:46:59] *** xabbuh has joined #postfix
[09:50:23] <d3c_> hm, I'm getting this error after installing postfix on Fedora and starting the postfix service: 'PID file /var/spool/postfix/pid/master.pid not readable (yet?) after start'. any ideas what might be wrong? I'm thinking permissions but I don't see why since this is a fresh install.
[09:51:20] <d3c_> I even tried "postfix set-permissions" but the error keeps occuring for every restart of postfix
[09:52:08] *** xxzz has joined #postfix
[09:54:34] *** Fleg_ has joined #postfix
[09:54:38] <d3c_> master.pid is 600
[09:54:40] <d3c_> root:root
[09:56:40] <Fleg_> I'm using fetchmail and postfix to fetch messages and deliver them to mailboxes. Some messages are rejected because postfix is configured with message_reject_characters = \0. Is there any way to replace the NUL character before delivering so that the messages don't get lost?
[09:56:56] *** seekwill has quit IRC
[10:09:05] *** azzid has quit IRC
[10:09:55] *** sphenxes has quit IRC
[10:11:44] *** sphenxes has joined #postfix
[10:22:15] *** BuenGenio has quit IRC
[10:27:32] *** azzid has joined #postfix
[10:27:41] *** Steve_The_Pirate has joined #postfix
[10:33:18] *** GieltjE has quit IRC
[10:33:55] *** BuenGenio has joined #postfix
[10:39:29] *** azzid has quit IRC
[10:42:37] *** azzid has joined #postfix
[10:44:55] *** matt1982 has quit IRC
[10:46:17] *** danblack has joined #postfix
[10:50:15] *** BuenGenio has quit IRC
[10:52:44] *** BuenGenio has joined #postfix
[10:53:08] *** BuenGenio has quit IRC
[11:01:25] *** KippiX has joined #postfix
[11:43:58] *** jkfod has joined #postfix
[12:04:49] *** [diablo] has joined #postfix
[12:11:52] *** diablo_ has joined #postfix
[12:12:58] *** [diablo] has quit IRC
[12:16:58] *** Bry8Star has quit IRC
[12:18:11] *** Bry8Star has joined #postfix
[12:33:43] *** autoditac has joined #postfix
[12:36:39] *** Cristian has joined #postfix
[12:37:13] <Cristian> Hi guys, need your help again :) Now I have an issue with postfixadmin, I can not find this option: http://www.peakinternet.com/vmail/pfadmin-forward.html
[12:37:27] *** jkfod has quit IRC
[12:37:29] <Cristian> I would like to add a mailbox but set forward option for it.
[12:41:01] <autoditac> hi, one thing i couldn't find out from the docs is: can i specify relay_recipient_maps without specifying relay_domains or by just setting a wildcard in relay_domains?
[12:44:09] <danblack> !tell Cristian postfixadmin
[12:44:10] <knoba> Cristian: "postfixadmin" : used for managing email accounts through a web interface (http://high5.net/postfixadmin/). Further, this channel is for issues regarding postfix. For postfixadmin support, please try the postfixadmin mailing list or the postfixadmin channel.
[12:45:04] <danblack> autoditac: probably not.
[12:46:08] *** Nido has quit IRC
[12:50:29] <Cristian> Found the solution. You had to login as the user...
[12:52:26] *** xxzz has quit IRC
[12:52:27] *** Nido has joined #postfix
[12:52:55] *** jarr0dsz has joined #postfix
[13:20:12] *** Cristian has quit IRC
[13:28:05] *** gerhard7 has joined #postfix
[13:29:10] *** alcy has quit IRC
[13:30:34] *** happymeerkat has joined #postfix
[13:30:58] *** alcy has joined #postfix
[13:51:22] <jarr0dsz> hi everyone
[13:51:43] <jarr0dsz> im trying to send out mail true postfix, its open on port 587 username and password for email account are supplied in apple mail client
[13:51:54] <jarr0dsz> but it does not connect how could i best debug why it doesent work?
[13:52:01] <jarr0dsz> nothing much special in the postfix log even
[13:58:13] *** scarleo has joined #postfix
[14:00:18] *** alcy has quit IRC
[14:01:06] <jelly> jarr0dsz: you can use swaks to test whether the connection is established and username/password auth works
[14:01:27] <jarr0dsz> jelly: swaks? havent heard of that before
[14:01:44] <jarr0dsz> if i enter my hostname inside mxtoolbox.com it gives no errors, no open relay
[14:01:47] <jelly> it's... better than using telent
[14:01:54] <jelly> !swaks
[14:01:54] <knoba> jelly: "swaks" : Swiss Army Knife SMTP - The SMTP transaction testing tool - http://jetmore.org/john/code/#swaks
[14:03:21] <jarr0dsz> jelly: okay thanks i look into that
[14:03:51] <jarr0dsz> beside using swaks wich i have to divein, is there a quick way to check why i cannot send mail? telnet session and auth with username password?
[14:04:01] <jarr0dsz> appe mail just gives general error wich is useless
[14:04:26] <jarr0dsz> if i can connect with telnet host 587 and it shows the postfix server then i guess at least the server is running fine and open on port 587 but it could be some auth error
[14:06:02] *** scarleo has quit IRC
[14:06:17] <jarr0dsz> okay perl swaks and then inside the script to i added my info at hostname dot com
[14:06:29] <jarr0dsz> wich gives a *** IO::Socket::INET: connect: timeout
[14:07:26] <jelly> don't edit the swaks script. It has command line options
[14:08:15] <jelly> swaks --help ought to format and show a man page
[14:08:34] <jarr0dsz> okay great, swaks works sending testmail on the server but not from my local machine
[14:09:02] <jarr0dsz> so its some connection issue swaks says its timing out but strange thing i can do telnet hostname.com 587 and it shows postfix ;s
[14:09:06] <jarr0dsz> contradicting
[14:09:53] *** Steve_The_Pirate has quit IRC
[14:10:24] <jarr0dsz> ah damn is see it already it tries port 25 wich is blocked ;p
[14:10:54] <lunaphyte_> configure your mail client to use the proper port [587]
[14:11:11] <lunaphyte_> apple mail will "helpfully" try a number of ports by default.
[14:11:16] <lunaphyte_> configure it to only use port 587
[14:11:43] <jarr0dsz> lunaphyte_: yes thx i have set it explicit to port 587 in appe mail client
[14:11:54] <lunaphyte_> good. does it now work?
[14:11:57] <jarr0dsz> using perl swaks --port 587 on localhost gives me no error and i recieve email in my inbox
[14:12:09] <jarr0dsz> but strange thing that is with no authorisation in form of info at domain dot com, and password
[14:12:40] <jarr0dsz> so if i connect with mail client i use non secure connection and info at domain dot com with password on port 587 to connect and there it gives me errors
[14:13:48] <lunaphyte_> please supply the data as directed by way of the channel /topic
[14:15:30] <jarr0dsz> lunaphyte_: http://pastie.org/private/5rf6atfr9lvsoxxyuge0q ( postconf -n )
[14:15:54] <jarr0dsz> logs show nothing of a failed connection i checked /var/log/maillog
[14:15:55] *** alcy has joined #postfix
[14:16:09] <lunaphyte_> just pastebin the logs.
[14:16:16] *** pexapor has joined #postfix
[14:16:44] *** speedieg has joined #postfix
[14:17:15] <speedieg> !debug
[14:17:16] <knoba> speedieg: "debug" : http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html : a good starting point for how to deal with problems and to report information to those who might help. Post your information in a pastebin such as http://pastebin.ca/ or http://dpaste.com/
[14:18:00] *** jyryt has quit IRC
[14:19:36] <jarr0dsz> okay walk through that thx
[14:21:06] <jarr0dsz> it seems to connect onnect from s53753c5f.adsl.wanadoo.nl[83.117.60.95]
[14:21:37] <jarr0dsz> if im using swaks how can it send mail without a username , password thats what i wonder
[14:21:50] <lunaphyte_> pastebin logs of the transaction
[14:22:07] <jarr0dsz> lunaphyte_: you mean the /var/log/syslog tail?
[14:22:25] <lunaphyte_> logs of the email transaction
[14:22:50] *** alcy has quit IRC
[14:23:06] <lunaphyte_> do you now know where postfix logs?
[14:23:56] <jarr0dsz> yes according to docs it should log to /var/log/syslog or /var/log/messages on centos
[14:24:03] <lunaphyte_> what does?
[14:24:05] <lunaphyte_> *docs
[14:25:42] <atossava> it should go to /var/log/maillog on centos
[14:25:43] *** schlitzer|freihe has joined #postfix
[14:26:01] *** ssureshot has quit IRC
[14:26:50] <jarr0dsz> yes i red it in blog post on setting up mailserver on centos
[14:26:56] <jarr0dsz> this is my tail of last lines http://pastie.org/private/sn5kpystlvxvfgrdt8iw
[14:27:24] *** MaximusColourum has joined #postfix
[14:27:27] <lunaphyte_> you need to become more familiar with the basics of linux administration before trying to run a mail server.
[14:28:41] <lunaphyte_> being able to read the sotware's documentation, and understand how logging is done, and understanding your operating system's syslog system must be done first.
[14:28:54] <lunaphyte_> some "blog" is not documentation.
[14:29:17] *** MaximusColourum has quit IRC
[14:29:46] <jarr0dsz> lunaphyte_: i have red the docs on setting it up and followed a few howtos i coudent find the correct postfix log so searched for postfix centos so came up with that article on mailservers where this was listed
[14:30:10] <jarr0dsz> lunaphyte_: but you right i could still learn alot on linux administration
[14:30:22] *** MaximusColourum has joined #postfix
[14:30:37] <lunaphyte_> the manner in which postfix logs is explicitely described in DEBUG_README
[14:32:17] <lunaphyte_> !syslog_facility
[14:32:18] <knoba> lunaphyte_: "syslog_facility" : a configuration parameter in the main.cf: The syslog facility of Postfix logging. Specify a facility as defined in syslog.conf(5). The default facility is "mail".
[14:32:39] <lunaphyte_> !syslog_name
[14:32:39] <knoba> lunaphyte_: "syslog_name" : a configuration parameter in the main.cf: The mail system name that is prepended to the process name in syslog records, so that "smtpd" becomes, for example, "postfix/smtpd".
[14:33:40] <jarr0dsz> hm really in the blue why it won't work, i use dovecot for delivery with a passwd file containing the usernames and passwords
[14:34:10] <jarr0dsz> it just connects times out or says username , password in correct for outgoing mailserver and even if settings checked, correct entered again its still doesent send mail :(
[14:34:45] <jarr0dsz> while swaks just sends out mail without any password or username ( I did set my ip to be whitelisted )
[14:37:50] *** alcy has joined #postfix
[14:39:02] <alcy> folks, any docs describing the meaning of NOQUEUE ? is it only for users without proper auth ?
[14:40:48] <schlitzer|freihe> hey all
[14:41:21] <schlitzer|freihe> is there a way to cleanup the mailqueue from mails that are send to a specific domain?
[14:42:39] *** snearch has joined #postfix
[14:49:11] *** d3c_ has quit IRC
[14:49:25] <jarr0dsz> debugged a bit following the docs
[14:49:29] *** d3c has joined #postfix
[14:49:42] <jarr0dsz> it seems that i can send only to my own hostname not outside then i get relay denied error
[14:55:15] *** Motafoca has joined #postfix
[14:55:38] <Motafoca> guys, for my email server thats only webmail, i can leave only smtp port open?
[14:55:54] <Motafoca> so i can receive the emails...
[14:55:58] <Motafoca> correct?
[15:01:47] <samlt> Motafoca, +webmail [and e.g. ssh]
[15:02:02] <samlt> Motafoca, but yes
[15:02:06] <Motafoca> nice
[15:02:06] <Motafoca> thanks
[15:03:30] *** Zweisteine has quit IRC
[15:03:40] *** Zweisteine has joined #postfix
[15:18:32] <Motafoca> were can i get the log of emailing?
[15:18:33] <d3c> what's the probably most lightweight pop3 client that I can use for testing postfix on my dev box?
[15:18:44] <Motafoca> d3c: telnet? :)
[15:18:48] <Motafoca> very light
[15:18:49] <Motafoca> :)
[15:19:14] <Motafoca> my postfix aint creating a log inside /var/log, its uses some other location?
[15:19:22] <d3c> Motafoca: I'd like to be able to connect from a regular mail client, e.g. Safari on OSX
[15:19:38] <d3c> Motafoca: so I'm gonna need a pop3 server, sorry
[15:20:23] <Motafoca> safari is mail client?
[15:20:29] <Motafoca> i tought it was web client
[15:20:34] *** leto has joined #postfix
[15:20:44] <Motafoca> but you can use this simple example
[15:20:44] <Motafoca> http://www.anta.net/misc/telnet-troubleshooting/pop.shtml
[15:20:49] <Motafoca> if you want to just test
[15:21:06] <lunaphyte_> pop3 should not be used. use imap
[15:21:16] <lunaphyte_> and safari is a web browser, not an email client.
[15:21:35] <lunaphyte_> telnet and/or s_client can be used to test any of smtp, submission, pop3, imap, etc.
[15:21:55] *** hever has quit IRC
[15:22:29] *** gerhard7 has quit IRC
[15:22:46] <leto> Hi, I've a "Recipient address rejected: Domain not found" error with postfix. I'd like to bypass recipient verification for this particular domain (that I trust), is it possible?
[15:22:51] *** danblack has quit IRC
[15:23:17] <lunaphyte_> why is it failing?
[15:23:22] <lunaphyte_> just fix that.
[15:24:02] <Motafoca> funny, my dns is publicated, i can email the domain emails, but outside not
[15:24:11] <Motafoca> were can i check the sendmail stuff?
[15:25:04] <leto> lunaphyte_: the recipient address is prefix.mydomain.net. It probaly fail because it's an alias/virtual address. That's why I'd like to bypass recipient verification (by a whitelist or similar) in postfix
[15:25:27] <lunaphyte_> provide the data is instructed by way of the channel /topic
[15:25:32] <lunaphyte_> *as instructed
[15:28:04] <Motafoca> http://pastebin.com/8cWVkGDL
[15:28:21] <Motafoca> how do i debug my send mail, since i dont get any emails delivered?
[15:28:55] <d3c> lunaphyte_: doh, meant "Mail", sorry. isn't pop3 a lot more simple for just testing emails sent by an app via postfix?
[15:29:07] <lunaphyte_> not really
[15:29:19] <leto> lunaphyte_: http://pastebin.com/jen4Cndq
[15:31:14] *** m1nish has joined #postfix
[15:31:19] <d3c> lunaphyte_: ok. anyway, what's a dead simple imap server that I can use with postfix then? I've setup postfix to deliver *all* email to my local 'dev' users account. I just want to access this account via e.g. Apple's Mail or whatever regular users use.
[15:31:37] <d3c> user's account*
[15:34:59] <d3c> lunaphyte_: courier?
[15:41:46] *** xabbuh has quit IRC
[15:42:28] *** mikunos has joined #postfix
[15:43:18] <mikunos> hi guys how have I to get by bash shell who is the sender of the emails?
[15:44:02] <wdp> sender as in From: or sender as in client?
[15:44:30] <mikunos> in From wdp
[15:44:37] <wdp> grep "From:" mailfile
[15:44:39] <wdp> :>
[15:44:57] <mikunos> :D
[15:45:09] <mikunos> I am executing this command: postconf -n
[15:45:13] <mikunos> sorry
[15:45:23] <mikunos> I am executing this command: watch -n1 tail -30 /var/log/mail.log
[15:45:25] <Dominian> !goal
[15:45:26] <knoba> Dominian: "goal" : describe your goal, not what you think the solution is
[15:45:47] <wdp> lost in translation
[15:46:15] <Dominian> first you mention postconf -n then you mention tailing the mail log.
[15:46:18] * Dominian is totally confused
[15:46:26] <mikunos> My goal is check who is the user who send the email at this moment
[15:46:37] <mikunos> sorry for my english
[15:47:12] <mikunos> maybe I am under backscatter attack
[15:47:40] <leto> lunaphyte_: any idea?
[15:48:50] <mikunos> wdp any hint?
[15:48:59] *** rsc has left #postfix
[15:51:09] <_ruben> you could add a header check with /^from:/ WARN
[15:52:40] <mikunos> hi _ruben are u talking with me?
[15:54:23] <Rovanion> The recipient adress gets rejected when it's a remote adress, this is the log: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/555044/ . And this is my postconf: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/555050/
[15:55:28] *** Motafoca has left #postfix
[15:55:58] *** Southron has joined #postfix
[16:02:39] <leto> well no answers, so I helped myself: problem fixed by adding a dns entry for my subdomain, thus the recipient address is an existing host
[16:02:56] *** happymeerkat has quit IRC
[16:04:11] <mikunos> how can I get the list of the email sent with the user/email used to sent those emails?
[16:04:24] <Dominian> mikunos: logs
[16:11:36] <mikunos> Dominian in the logs there is no sender but just the recipient
[16:12:02] <Dominian> There should be a log of from and to in the logs for each email passed through the system
[16:16:17] *** hever has joined #postfix
[16:17:15] <mikunos> look this Feb 22 16:15:51 mailserver postfix/smtp[19741]: E3812A20C0: to=<scinfo at public2 dot sta.net.cn>, relay=none, delay=246379, delays=246337/0.02/42/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to public2.sta.net.cn[202.96.194.129]:25: Connection timed out)
[16:17:37] <mikunos> who is the sender?
[16:18:13] <mikunos> Dominian ^^
[16:23:43] <rob0> delays=246337/0.02/42/0 <-- has been in the queue a long time, 246379 seconds. Look at when it ENTERED the queue, all those seconds ago. See also mailq
[16:24:55] <Dominian> mikunos: what rob0 said
[16:25:05] <Dominian> That log entry there is from the queue trying to 'redeliver' the email and failing
[16:25:10] <Dominian> You need to find when it actually came into the queue
[16:25:29] <Dominian> look for : E3812A20C0
[16:25:40] <Dominian> that's the queue id that was assigned to athat message.. maybe you'll get lucky
[16:25:55] *** nowthatsamatt has joined #postfix
[16:26:07] <rob0> it also looks like:
[16:26:14] <rob0> !port_25_block
[16:26:14] <knoba> rob0: "port_25_block" : Many consumer-grade ISPs (and some which claim to be for business, such as Godaddy) block outbound port 25/tcp traffic to prevent abuse from their network. If your ISP does this, you should see the !basic and !relayhost factoids. Or, upgrade to business-class service (or change ISP if you already had it.)
[16:26:29] <rob0> or maybe a compromised system
[16:26:55] *** hever has quit IRC
[16:26:55] * rob0 isn't going to read the scrollback, just throwing out ideas
[16:27:10] *** Diranged has joined #postfix
[16:40:04] *** Steve_The_Pirate has joined #postfix
[16:46:01] *** leto has left #postfix
[16:46:44] *** cilly has joined #postfix
[16:47:10] *** wdp has quit IRC
[16:48:53] *** diablo_ has quit IRC
[16:49:58] *** Steve_The_Pirate has quit IRC
[16:51:06] *** mambaw has joined #postfix
[16:53:50] *** Toerkeium has joined #postfix
[16:56:25] *** Fleg_ has quit IRC
[17:00:56] *** amir has quit IRC
[17:01:16] *** pexapor has quit IRC
[17:01:38] *** pexapor has joined #postfix
[17:04:59] *** famicom has quit IRC
[17:07:15] *** mikunos has left #postfix
[17:09:02] *** Steve_The_Pirate has joined #postfix
[17:11:56] *** amir has joined #postfix
[17:12:42] *** Steve_The_Pirate has quit IRC
[17:14:30] <d3c> what's a really simple pop3 server that allows me to read mails from a system user? I tried ipop3d but it doesn't seem to work on my Fedora dev box. any other solutions? I just need something very basic, as it's just for viewing the emails sent by my web app in a regular mail client.
[17:15:21] *** jkfod has joined #postfix
[17:17:08] *** abyss has quit IRC
[17:18:22] <alcy> dovecot is pretty straightforward
[17:18:33] <alcy> to setup n use
[17:19:55] *** Toerkeium has quit IRC
[17:21:06] *** abyss has joined #postfix
[17:21:31] <twobitsprite> I'm getting a message in my logs that says "server configuration error" but doesn't give any details about what errors are in the configuration
[17:21:34] <twobitsprite> Feb 22 10:12:32 mxrelay1 postfix/smtpd[24757]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from e36.co.us.ibm.com[32.97.110.154]: 451 Server configuration error; from=<> to=<**** at **** dot com> proto=ESMTP helo=<e36.co.us.ibm.com>
[17:21:44] <twobitsprite> (censored the to=)
[17:21:57] <rob0> POP3 should have died out 10 years ago. IMAP has replaced it. But perhaps you need neither? You can directly read a maildir or mbox file with any pager.
[17:22:08] <twobitsprite> is this saying there's a configuration error on the remote server, or on mine? if mine, how do I figure out where the error is?
[17:22:37] <rob0> twobitsprite, is not looking at mail.* logs
[17:23:05] <rob0> some stupid OS think it's a good idea to split up logging in silly ways
[17:23:13] * rob0 disagrees
[17:23:51] <rob0> there was a higher priority error just before that one.
[17:25:26] <twobitsprite> I don't see any other mail logs, all I have at /var/log/maillog[.x]
[17:25:36] <twobitsprite> and there aren't any other errors higher up in the log
[17:25:50] <twobitsprite> wait...
[17:26:13] <twobitsprite> *bonk* nevermind
[17:26:26] <twobitsprite> forgot I had done a grep ... maillog | less
[17:26:33] <twobitsprite> sorry
[17:31:42] *** breaker313 has quit IRC
[17:35:00] *** khem_ has joined #postfix
[17:35:14] <khem_> !debug
[17:35:15] <knoba> khem_: "debug" : http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html : a good starting point for how to deal with problems and to report information to those who might help. Post your information in a pastebin such as http://pastebin.ca/ or http://dpaste.com/
[17:41:25] *** Bry8Star_ has joined #postfix
[17:41:26] *** doomas has quit IRC
[17:41:51] *** Bry8Star has quit IRC
[17:42:17] *** Bry8Star_ is now known as Bry8Star
[17:43:56] *** doomas has joined #postfix
[17:44:16] *** famicom has joined #postfix
[17:50:51] *** wdp has joined #postfix
[17:53:48] *** Diranged has left #postfix
[17:55:14] <khem_> hrm
[17:59:15] *** Diranged has joined #postfix
[18:00:35] <Diranged> lets say I have a production mail-sending-farm that sends a few hundred thousand messages a day. everything is DKIM'd properly, and SPFd. the addresses come from @domain.com. Our inbound mial for @domain.com though is passed through either google, or through another mail service. Do I need to allow any inbound mail to these 'mail senders', or will bouncebacks always go through our normal MX records?
[18:02:56] <rob0> hmm? Bounces go to the MX (or A if no MX) of the sender domain.
[18:02:59] <rob0> !example
[18:03:00] <knoba> rob0: "example" : Example.TLD has been reserved for examples in generic top-level domains (com,net,org) and many other TLDs. Please do not use real Internet names as examples.
[18:03:30] <kreign> rob0, domain.com is such a common example use, they should've used domain.com for the RFC. :)
[18:03:50] <rob0> that's why Dotster paid so much to own it
[18:04:02] <patdk-wk> hmm, I can't get enough of people
[18:04:11] <kreign> rob0, domain.com or example.tld?
[18:04:16] <patdk-wk> guy had bad helo name, we had them fix it
[18:04:25] <patdk-wk> they fixed it, but now it has a extra space on the end
[18:04:58] <kreign> rob0, wasn't it a verisign tld at one point?
[18:05:36] <rob0> com is verisign, isn't it?
[18:05:44] <patdk-wk> .com and .net
[18:05:57] <patdk-wk> but domain.com is owned via godaddy I believe
[18:06:05] <patdk-wk> I think dotster is a godaddy thing
[18:06:09] <rob0> no, Dotster is a registrar
[18:06:18] <patdk-wk> oh, a different one?
[18:06:22] <Diranged> ok.. so all bounces will go through our normal MX inbound config, which is good.
[18:06:34] <kreign> godaddy is supposedly shelling out like verisign has due to bad rep
[18:06:47] <Diranged> ok second question then.. is there any benefit to my postfix sender boxes identifying their real public hostnames, or is it reasonable for them to lie and just say that they're "mailer.ourdomain.blah"
[18:07:38] <patdk-wk> I won't accept mail from you, if they don't use real working names
[18:07:43] <kreign> Diranged, I don't see why to not use the real hostnames.
[18:08:02] <kreign> Diranged, if you're only accepting from an MX it's not much consequence...
[18:08:04] <rob0> you definitely must use FCrDNS
[18:08:16] <Diranged> thats what i figured.. and im fine with it...
[18:08:30] <kreign> I need to get SPL working for my stuff.
[18:08:32] <rob0> helo/PTR/A all in agreement
[18:08:39] <kreign> you guys notice much spam drop with it implemented vs. it not?
[18:09:16] *** nowthatsamatt has quit IRC
[18:09:18] <patdk-wk> what is spl?
[18:09:42] <rob0> Diranged might also want to hire a deliverability consultant if problems continue beyond that.
[18:10:02] <rob0> because there is nothing more you can do in Postfix
[18:10:24] <Diranged> heh ok last question about DNS … what if we use CNAMEs instead of A records for our actual mailer servers.. so i have "foo.domain.tld" CNAME for "foo-1235123123.amazon.com". but in amazon, we have them set the reverse PTR record be "foo.domain.tld"?
[18:10:36] <Diranged> or do i need to just go ahead and do an A record for foo.domain.tld that points to our eip..
[18:10:49] <Diranged> (btw, we're not having deliverability problems yet.. trying to head them off by cleaning up alot of things)
[18:10:50] <rob0> definitely not use CNAMEs in mail
[18:10:55] <Diranged> yeah thats what i figured
[18:10:56] <patdk-wk> I don't think cnames are valid
[18:11:00] <patdk-wk> read the rfc's :)
[18:13:02] <twobitsprite> I believe the RFC specifically forbids CNAMES in MX records
[18:14:12] *** d3c has quit IRC
[18:14:54] <kreign> yeah
[18:14:59] <kreign> it will work, I think.
[18:15:01] <kreign> but it's not valid.
[18:15:25] <kreign> (variable definition of "work")
[18:15:33] <twobitsprite> I would't bet on all relays resolving them correctly
[18:15:38] <kreign> good interview question for "mail experts"
[18:15:51] <twobitsprite> I know Domino doesn't like them... ran in to that problem before
[18:16:50] <twobitsprite> ahh, found it: rfc2181 section 10.3 :)
[18:16:54] <patdk-wk> I don't use cnames, so I don't think they are valid :)
[18:17:00] <patdk-wk> been to many years since I looked at the rfc for that
[18:17:09] <kreign> twobitsprite, sweet
[18:17:23] *** wdp_ has joined #postfix
[18:17:34] <twobitsprite> This domain name must have as its value one or more address records. Currently those will be A records, however in the future other record types giving addressing information may be acceptable. It can also have other RRs, but never a CNAME RR.
[18:17:59] <kreign> twobitsprite, i had a guy a while back who could tell me which sections of which RFC certain 'best practices' originate from, but he didn't know anything about actual management/configuration/etc. of general stuff. really odd.
[18:18:12] <twobitsprite> strange
[18:18:15] <adaptr> kreign: anybody can read.
[18:18:17] <twobitsprite> admin savant?
[18:18:27] <twobitsprite> adaptr: there is that too
[18:18:41] <adaptr> that implies he was good at it. no experience means he's a walking disaster
[18:18:52] <kreign> adaptr, untrue. there are quite a few people who are apparently unable to do read or comprehend basic English. like my boss.
[18:19:00] <twobitsprite> lol
[18:19:05] <adaptr> does HE know how to troubleshoot postfix ?
[18:19:08] <kreign> heh
[18:19:12] <adaptr> there you are, then
[18:19:20] *** schlitzer|freihe has quit IRC
[18:19:25] <adaptr> step 1: learn to read
[18:19:27] <kreign> no, that would go something like, "Is it bigger than a breadbox?"
[18:19:28] <adaptr> step 2: ....
[18:19:32] <adaptr> step 3: prostfix!
[18:19:36] <kreign> lol
[18:19:50] <kreign> adaptr, yeah, boss jumps straight to "prostfix!"
[18:20:08] <kreign> what's funny is he's a huge microsoft junkie and loves the cloud.
[18:20:13] <kreign> but dishes on postfix.
[18:20:26] <kreign> he's pushing all his customers to o365 and the like.
[18:20:58] <kreign> largely because 'their email service is superior'
[18:21:13] <twobitsprite> ugh...
[18:21:20] <kreign> ... because they run postfix, I suppose?
[18:21:30] <twobitsprite> do they?
[18:21:51] <kreign> bigfish = postfix
[18:21:58] <tuxick> i saw zimbra comes with postfix, but i wonder about its performance, anyone run into it?
[18:21:59] <kreign> at least that's what the service ID says.
[18:22:15] <tuxick> i mean the java/zimbra bit, i know postfix works ok :)
[18:22:36] <twobitsprite> weird...
[18:22:46] <kreign> tuxick, I um don't know about the java, but the mail storage/IMAP is dovecot, which works quite well. perf is going to be hardware constricted, not software.
[18:22:55] <kreign> more than likely. ;)
[18:23:36] <rob0> bigfish is Microsoft, no?
[18:23:41] <tuxick> dovecot? you sure? i thought it used its own storage
[18:25:07] <twobitsprite> 220 TX2EHSMHS004.bigfish.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:24:13 +0000
[18:25:10] <twobitsprite> dat uptime
[18:25:13] <kreign> rob0, no, it is. :)
[18:25:16] *** Motoko has joined #postfix
[18:25:36] <twobitsprite> or is that just the current time... probably is, nevermind :P
[18:25:39] <rob0> maybe they have something different for outgoing
[18:25:41] *** Toerkeium has joined #postfix
[18:26:09] <kreign> rob0, you can change the server banner in postfix, yes? :)
[18:26:21] <kreign> it's not claiming to be anything, just that it's run by microsoft.
[18:26:33] <twobitsprite> true
[18:26:45] <kreign> but yeah, it'll identify on outgoing as postfix
[18:26:48] <kreign> it's not a consistent service.
[18:27:06] <kreign> it works, but to no props go to microsoft...
[18:27:14] <rob0> what IP address was that twobitsprite?
[18:27:49] <twobitsprite> I just did a "nc mail.global.bigfish.com 25"
[18:28:54] <twobitsprite> only 2 servers in that A record
[18:29:01] <rob0> That is definitely not Postfix.
[18:29:11] <adaptr> "IPs". there may be dozens of servers
[18:29:23] <twobitsprite> adaptr: he asked which IP :P
[18:29:26] <rob0> I hit 65.55.88.22 from here.
[18:29:31] <patdk-wk> heh, that is exchange :)
[18:30:10] <adaptr> Exchange exposing itself sounds just as good as "middle-aged pervert"
[18:30:13] <kreign> meanwhile, in Redmond (or somewhere in India), "Metesh, the people in #postfix, they are attacking!"
[18:30:40] <rob0> You can change the banner all you want (not sure why anyone would want to pretend to be MSexchange ...), but you can't change the smtpd behavior without rewriting the source.
[18:30:44] <patdk-wk> heh, I don't even let my iis servers touch the internet
[18:30:52] <patdk-wk> reverse proxy them via apache or something else
[18:31:00] <patdk-wk> hopefully with mod_security working on it :)
[18:32:35] *** ssureshot has joined #postfix
[18:56:56] *** krzee has quit IRC
[19:00:28] *** m1nish has quit IRC
[19:02:22] *** KippiX has quit IRC
[19:32:31] *** haidz has left #postfix
[19:36:40] *** ssureshot has quit IRC
[19:39:12] *** ciklid has joined #postfix
[19:39:39] *** seekwill has joined #postfix
[19:39:39] *** seekwill has joined #postfix
[19:49:29] *** alcy has quit IRC
[19:52:31] *** evilbulgarian has quit IRC
[19:55:15] *** ciklid has quit IRC
[19:58:42] *** romel_ has joined #postfix
[20:00:42] <romel_> hi guys. is there any way to disable non-deliverable messages in postfix? the problem is that postfix works as a relay for some host which doesn't listen on 25 port at all
[20:01:00] <Dominian> Then don't relay for domains that won't accpet your email
[20:01:14] <romel_> so the queue of non-deliverable reports grows fast
[20:01:23] *** Diranged has quit IRC
[20:05:59] *** gongoputch has quit IRC
[20:08:56] <rob0> I don't understand the problem.
[20:11:13] <thumbs> I don't understand rob0
[20:12:17] <rob0> that is a problem!
[20:12:55] <rob0> In Soviet Russia, problem understand YOU
[20:16:47] <patdk-wk> heh, I found email server software that fails pregreet :)
[20:16:54] <patdk-wk> anyone like to use winmail?
[20:19:53] *** matt1982 has joined #postfix
[20:21:41] *** autoditac has quit IRC
[20:44:36] *** gongoputch has joined #postfix
[20:51:58] *** MaximusColourum has quit IRC
[21:05:44] *** biggi_mat has joined #postfix
[21:10:34] *** Dmole has joined #postfix
[21:12:36] <Dmole> noob question: is there a way to add postfix 2.9 to yum priorities?
[21:12:56] *** krzee has joined #postfix
[21:12:59] <rob0> that would probably be a yum question
[21:13:19] <Dmole> it's more of a "where is the repo" question
[21:13:43] <rob0> and that would be one for #your-distro-here
[21:14:04] <Dmole> not so much
[21:14:26] <rob0> Okay.
[21:14:46] <Dmole> it's not "how to use apt or yum" it's is postfix maintaining a repo for any distro?
[21:14:57] <rob0> No.
[21:15:03] <Dmole> ah thanks
[21:15:27] <Dmole> rpm it is then :(
[21:15:59] <rob0> Simon Mudd maintains SRPMs for Postfix.
[21:16:12] <Dmole> thanks
[21:16:28] <Dmole> 2nd question: is there a page for postfix EOL (end of life)?
[21:16:37] <rob0> yes, the download page
[21:17:53] <Dmole> yes I see it, I guess there was no "End of life" on the page so google missed it
[21:18:12] <Dmole> thanks again
[21:18:41] <rob0> 2.5 was just EOL, 2.6 will be in about a year.
[21:19:44] <rob0> He's going for yearly releases, early in Q1, followed by EOL of the then-oldest supported release.
[21:20:23] <Dmole> I'm still using 2.3.3 on CentOS release 5.7 ~
[21:24:55] *** s0ber_ has joined #postfix
[21:27:01] *** s0ber has quit IRC
[21:27:15] *** s0ber_ is now known as s0ber
[21:28:45] *** chadmaynard has quit IRC
[21:29:48] <Dmole> this looks about right: http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.9/RPMS-rhel5-x86_64/postfix-2.9.1-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
[21:30:38] <rob0> good old Simon, getting 2.9.1 out quickly
[21:30:58] <rob0> that was just today
[21:33:36] *** localhost has quit IRC
[21:34:54] *** localhost has joined #postfix
[21:40:24] *** wdp_ has quit IRC
[21:46:33] <Corey> Indeed.
[21:49:21] *** danblack has joined #postfix
[21:57:41] *** krzee has quit IRC
[22:00:36] *** ThunderTree has joined #postfix
[22:01:32] <ThunderTree> !welcome
[22:01:32] <knoba> ThunderTree: "welcome" : welcome to #postfix! if you're joining for the first time, or are new to irc, the first thing you'll want to do is read the channel topic (/topic). it includes crucial instructions on how to effectively ask for help here, and what data you should include with your questions. the degree of success you'll have is directly related to how effectively you're able to follow those guidelines.
[22:01:40] <ThunderTree> .
[22:07:57] *** d3c has joined #postfix
[22:08:31] *** hobodave has joined #postfix
[22:10:28] *** snearch has quit IRC
[22:12:01] *** roentgen has joined #postfix
[22:20:27] *** ssureshot has joined #postfix
[22:24:08] *** Southron has quit IRC
[22:43:01] <zamba> hi there.. i'm currently running postfix and most of my users are virtual and handled using postfixadmin.. i now want to set up mailman to use for any number of domains.. how can i best integrate this into my existing setup?
[22:47:33] <tmberg> Tabmow: ?
[22:50:34] <Dominian> !mailman
[22:50:35] <knoba> Dominian: "mailman" : a listserv software (http://www.list.org)
[22:50:39] <Dominian> haha go figure
[22:50:55] <Dominian> zamba: there's documentation on mailman's site.. at least I'm pretty sure ther eis about using it with postfix
[22:59:03] *** matt1982 has quit IRC
[23:01:36] *** roentgen has quit IRC
[23:02:06] *** npmapn has quit IRC
[23:06:59] *** LostyJai has left #postfix
[23:07:37] *** quebre has quit IRC
[23:17:45] *** hever has joined #postfix
[23:21:57] *** biggi_mat has quit IRC
[23:22:13] *** nutron has quit IRC
[23:22:55] *** hever has quit IRC
[23:26:07] *** danblack has quit IRC
[23:28:03] <Tabmow> tmberg: yes?
[23:34:59] *** samlt has quit IRC
[23:35:56] *** wdp has quit IRC
[23:45:09] *** pexapor has quit IRC
[23:45:40] *** pexapor has joined #postfix
[23:47:42] *** hparker has quit IRC
[23:52:17] *** hparker has joined #postfix
top

   February 22, 2012  
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | >