November 22, 2007 
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | >
November 22, 2007 [00:01:39] <adaptr> and ?[00:04:46] *** chatran has left #postfix[00:11:38] *** lambda has quit IRC[00:13:19] *** Ryushin has quit IRC[00:14:39] *** robboplus_ has joined #postfix[00:14:44] <robboplus_> hello folks[00:14:57] <robboplus_> how can i make postfix listen on 127.0.0.1 instead of 0.0.0.0? can't find anything on that in config files[00:15:24] *** smtpsslproblem has quit IRC[00:15:26] <adaptr> !bind_address[00:15:27] <knoba> adaptr: Error: "bind_address" is not a valid command.[00:15:30] <adaptr> oh, sorry[00:15:35] <adaptr> wrong chan again :)[00:15:36] <robboplus_> got mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 in main.cf though[00:15:41] <robboplus_> adaptr he he[00:15:44] <adaptr> that has nothing to do with it[00:15:58] <robboplus_> should i add bind_address directive in conf?[00:16:01] <adaptr> !inet_interfaces[00:16:01] <knoba> adaptr: "inet_interfaces" : a configuration parameter in the main.cf: The network interface addresses that this mail system receives mail on. By default, the software claims all active interfaces on the machine. The parameter also controls delivery of mail to user at [ip dot address]. If your server does not react to connection attempts on a certain interface you should check this setting.[00:16:05] <robboplus_> hm[00:16:10] <robboplus_> damn nice[00:16:22] <adaptr> you're damn right[00:16:32] <robboplus_> oh yes it really is there... set to "all"[00:17:01] <robboplus_> restarting..[00:17:17] <robboplus_> fixed! i really like this MTA.[00:17:20] <robboplus_> many thanks adaptr[00:17:35] *** rob0_ has quit IRC[00:17:47] * adaptr triumphantly waves his spork at rob0[00:18:58] <robboplus_> lol[00:22:24] *** slimjimflim has joined #postfix[00:22:47] <slimjimflim> can anyone tell me how to find out where my postfix queue directory is?[00:23:05] <adaptr> well, yes[00:23:27] <adaptr> postconf queue_directory[00:23:51] <slimjimflim> thanks[00:26:04] <rob0> I see your spork, and raise a hullaballoo.[00:26:28] <adaptr> thank god, you're out of your Christian funk[00:27:20] <rob0> Yes. I'm sorry. Thank you.[00:27:22] *** meandtheshell has quit IRC[00:27:46] <adaptr> have you been infected with the bot ?[00:28:57] <rob0> Whatever it is, I wish I could get rid of it.[00:29:52] <adaptr> you're not the only one[00:34:18] *** PhilKC_ has joined #Postfix[00:34:30] *** PhilKC has quit IRC[00:39:30] *** PhilKC_ is now known as PhilKC[00:39:55] <slimjimflim> ok, i'm trying to enable sasl authentication w/ tls for dovecot and postfix. i'm able to receive mail, but not to send.[00:50:05] <hachiya> hmm, i need to get another server for a company i consult for, they need a large harddrive on this dedicated server so it can function as an ftp site for projects. anyone have good things to say about any particular dedicated server providers?[00:50:21] <adaptr> not a word, no :)[00:51:11] <hachiya> hmm[01:00:47] <rikur> hachiya: do you mind if the servers reside in Finland?[01:01:21] <rob0> Cold climate is good for cooling[01:01:41] <adaptr> yeah, scandinavian colos++[01:01:49] <adaptr> just put them outside[01:02:20] <rikur> hachiya: I can recommend Avenla. http://www.avenla.fi/InEnglish/Home/tabid/3813/language/en-US/Default.aspx[01:02:54] <rikur> I know a founder of that company, been to business for decades.[01:06:02] *** war has quit IRC[01:15:53] *** hparker has quit IRC[01:19:05] *** solar__ has joined #postfix[01:29:27] <rob0> ASP is a strike against them.[01:31:11] *** zez_zez has quit IRC[01:42:18] *** J_o_h_n has joined #postfix[01:42:44] *** J_o_h_n has left #postfix[01:47:29] *** ming_zym has joined #postfix[01:48:30] *** solar__ has quit IRC[02:11:27] *** eagle1 has joined #postfix[02:11:34] <eagle1> hi[02:11:37] <eagle1> there's an alternative to amavisd?[02:14:52] <rob0> That's an odd question. There are lots of alternatives![02:21:35] *** hparker has joined #postfix[02:30:40] <eagle1> rob0, sorry for the odd question. you know, we search for thing only when we need[02:30:56] <eagle1> can you advice me to a good (stable) alternative?[02:31:59] <rob0> haha, well, no, if I was going to do content filtering, I'd still stick with amavisd-new.[02:32:06] <rob0> !cheatsheet[02:32:06] <knoba> rob0: "cheatsheet" : http://jimsun.linxnet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt : A HOWTO for pre-DATA spam control.[02:32:31] <eagle1> old things[02:32:43] <eagle1> i already use all of this[02:32:46] <eagle1> simply i hate amavis[02:34:12] <rob0> Play around with some of the milters[02:34:20] <eagle1> ...[02:34:24] <eagle1> asspain a lot :D[02:34:29] <rob0> I haven't tried that yet[02:35:16] <rob0> eventually milter will be the way to go, because you can reject spam in the initial SMTP, rather than the postqueue reinjection junk.[02:35:16] <eagle1> may I ask you a little question?[02:35:41] <eagle1> i reject the mail on the greets for the 90 percent[02:35:50] <rob0> awww, how sweet, but I'm already married :)[02:35:58] <eagle1> lol[02:36:00] <eagle1> me too[02:36:05] <rob0> whew[02:36:05] * eagle1 show the finger[02:36:06] <rob0> ok[02:36:11] <eagle1> 26 yo and married[02:36:15] <eagle1> what a kind of life..[02:36:37] <eagle1> i'm on debian.. with new amavis-new i see that theres no more amavisd.conf[02:36:42] <eagle1> normal?[02:36:43] <eagle1> true?[02:36:55] <rob0> no idea[02:37:15] <rob0> yes, the HELO checking is very effective.[02:37:25] <eagle1> postgrey too[02:41:26] *** solar_ant has quit IRC[02:47:09] <Casan> are there any alternatives to Cyrus-SASL for SMTP AUTH ? I see there is already something such as an "smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes" option i postfix's master.cf - is that for something built-in ? I like to add asmtp support to the server to be able to allow users to relay using username+password under encrypted connections.[02:50:18] *** tris has quit IRC[02:50:53] *** pirho has quit IRC[02:50:54] *** stony has quit IRC[02:51:51] <Casan> of the little german I understand, I think this may be another indicator: http://www.huschi.net/4_181_de.html?highlight=sasl[02:54:28] <rob0> !sasl_readme[02:54:29] <knoba> rob0: "sasl_readme" : www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html[02:56:20] *** magyar has joined #postfix[02:57:37] *** cj_sze27 has joined #postfix[03:00:30] *** Ryushin has joined #postfix[03:05:04] *** Tachy_ has joined #postfix[03:08:36] *** tris has joined #postfix[03:15:05] <eagle1> bye rob0[03:15:08] <eagle1> fixed amavis[03:15:17] <eagle1> still use this crap thing :D[03:15:18] *** eagle1 has quit IRC[03:16:21] *** ming_zym has quit IRC[03:17:18] *** Tachy has quit IRC[03:20:03] *** ming_zym has joined #postfix[03:21:01] *** mavez has left #postfix[03:26:42] *** pythonic has quit IRC[03:34:39] <hachiya> rikur: thanks, i'll look at that URL you gave me[03:37:06] *** rob0_ has joined #postfix[03:37:23] *** Ryushin has quit IRC[03:37:28] <hachiya> what's a milter?[03:39:58] <rob0> !milter[03:39:59] <knoba> rob0: "milter" : Postfix support for Sendmail milters: http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html[03:46:22] *** githogori has quit IRC[03:48:43] *** ming_zym has quit IRC[03:49:35] *** xored has quit IRC[03:53:14] *** ming_zym has joined #postfix[04:13:29] *** ming_zym has quit IRC[04:13:51] *** ming_zym has joined #postfix[04:14:54] *** amrit|wrk is now known as amrit|bbl[04:20:40] *** cj_sze27 has quit IRC[04:43:50] *** Motoko-chan has joined #postfix[04:45:51] *** ming_zym has quit IRC[04:45:59] *** ming_zy1 has joined #postfix[04:48:02] *** PhilKC has quit IRC[04:54:42] *** PhilKC has joined #Postfix[05:10:51] *** DrkShdw has joined #postfix[05:22:54] *** DrkShdw has quit IRC[05:23:41] *** DrkShdw has joined #postfix[05:26:51] *** hparker has quit IRC[05:31:51] *** `VL has quit IRC[05:47:54] *** DrkShdw has quit IRC[05:55:38] *** jpalmer has quit IRC[05:57:11] *** cj_sze27 has joined #postfix[05:59:44] *** jpalmer has joined #postfix[05:59:57] *** Motoko-chan has quit IRC[06:03:27] *** Tinozaure is now known as Tino[06:03:34] *** Tino is now known as Tinozaure[06:09:55] *** githogori has joined #postfix[06:16:46] <hachiya> hmm, i use spamassassin + mailscanner with postfix (use it on my qmail server too), has been working pretty well[06:20:19] *** rmullins has joined #postfix[06:23:58] *** luke-jr has joined #postfix[06:24:18] <luke-jr> I'm getting Relay access denied from Postfix for mydestination immediately following upgrade to 2.4[06:30:26] <luke-jr> or rather, myhostname default is changed[06:54:35] *** solar345 has joined #postfix[06:59:00] <luke-jr> yay, postfix just lost a day's mail because 2.4 introduces bugs[06:59:07] *** jpalmer has quit IRC[06:59:12] <luke-jr> where's the bug tracker?[06:59:28] *** jpalmer has joined #postfix[07:01:19] <f3ew> uh?[07:01:21] *** jpalmer has joined #postfix[07:01:29] <f3ew> try sending stuff to the mailin list[07:01:48] <f3ew> I have not seen Postfix doing things like that[07:04:23] *** Joelwork has joined #postfix[07:05:43] *** Motoko-chan has joined #postfix[07:06:49] <luke-jr> f3ew: get_hostname was rewritten in 2.4 and totally broken[07:06:56] <luke-jr> I don't have time to mess with mailing lists for simple bugs[07:07:20] <luke-jr> get_hostname in 2.3 returned linux-1.dombr.org correctly, but 2.4 insists on giving it linux-1.localdomain[07:08:11] <f3ew> Hmmmmm?[07:08:23] <luke-jr> which caused it to bounce external mail delivery connections, and drop anything that did get internal (such as users on the same domain and fetchmail)[07:08:28] <f3ew> what's in your /etc/hosts file?[07:08:56] <luke-jr> 127.0.0.1 linux-1.dombr.org linuxone.dombr.org linuxone linux-1 linux1[07:08:57] <luke-jr> ::1 linux-1.dombr.org linuxone.dombr.org linuxone linux-1 linux1[07:09:16] <f3ew> 192.168.0.161 devdas-b devdas-b.internal.directi.com[07:09:17] <f3ew> here[07:09:42] <luke-jr> f3ew: are you using the default myhostname?[07:09:47] <f3ew> Postfix works correctly with this format[07:09:48] <f3ew> yes[07:09:50] <luke-jr> or setting it explicitly?[07:09:55] <f3ew> default[07:10:02] <luke-jr> default mydestination et al, as well?[07:10:05] <f3ew> yes[07:10:15] * luke-jr didn't see any way the new code COULD work, looking at the actual C[07:10:24] <luke-jr> it never calls gethostbyname now[07:10:47] <f3ew> I have seen this sort of issue happening when the fqdn is not at the end of the line in /etc/hosts[07:11:16] <luke-jr> that would be a Postfix bug still[07:11:28] <luke-jr> since there is no requirement of /etc/hosts having a FQDN in it[07:13:18] <f3ew> Well, for most people who don't have a fqdn in /etc/hosts, appending localdomain shouldn't matter[07:13:32] <luke-jr> obviously it should[07:13:33] <f3ew> And anyway, the bug tracker _is_ the mailing list[07:13:41] <luke-jr> no mail server is sane with localdomain[07:13:42] <f3ew> the developer list[07:18:37] <luke-jr> f3ew: the mailing list website says bug reports are not welcome on the list[07:18:49] <luke-jr> postfix-devel at postfix dot org: for people who design, implement or maintain Postfix source code. NOT for questions, problem reports and feature requests; tresspassers will be removed from the mailing list.[07:19:42] <f3ew> the user list should work fine too[07:19:59] * f3ew tends to ask on the -users list[07:20:37] <luke-jr> there comes a point where instead of reporting a bug, it is easier to work around it[07:20:51] <f3ew> feel free[07:21:05] *** schezuan has joined #postfix[07:26:51] *** asmas has joined #postfix[07:40:44] *** cj_sze27 has quit IRC[07:41:34] *** schezuan is now known as cj_sze27[07:47:25] *** solar345 is now known as solar_ant[07:58:13] *** lambda has joined #postfix[08:00:12] *** rootsvr has quit IRC[08:00:45] *** asmas has quit IRC[08:01:36] *** Joelwork has quit IRC[08:02:44] *** Joelwork has joined #postfix[08:08:15] *** Jax has joined #postfix[08:15:38] *** schezuan has joined #postfix[08:17:22] *** asmas has joined #postfix[08:19:57] *** cj_sze27 has quit IRC[08:20:34] *** hollo has quit IRC[08:31:35] *** suzaku has joined #postfix[08:33:50] *** Mavvie has joined #postfix[08:41:13] *** arooyo has joined #postfix[08:44:38] *** arooyo has quit IRC[08:50:31] *** zez_zez has joined #postfix[08:51:56] *** schezuan has quit IRC[08:52:01] *** bhagat has joined #postfix[08:55:11] *** suzaku has quit IRC[08:55:54] *** bhagat has quit IRC[09:02:09] *** Lap_64 has joined #postfix[09:06:06] *** lambda has quit IRC[09:07:23] *** ming_zy1 has quit IRC[09:09:00] *** bhagat has joined #postfix[09:10:27] *** kreg_lt has joined #postfix[09:10:53] <kreg_lt> why setup TLS when you can have a client connect directly with SSL?[09:11:33] *** ming_zym has joined #postfix[09:14:06] *** e^ipi has joined #postfix[09:14:09] <e^ipi> holas[09:18:42] <e^ipi> postfix is misbehaving & not reading my aliases as it should be[09:18:50] *** Lap_64 has quit IRC[09:19:24] *** Lap_64 has joined #postfix[09:19:25] <e^ipi> main.cf: http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/793452 /etc/mail/aliases: http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/793451[09:19:32] <e^ipi> yes i did run newaliases[09:20:18] <e^ipi> log:[09:20:18] <e^ipi> Nov 22 00:12:37 vds29.entic.net postfix/smtpd[29674]: [ID 197553 mail.info] NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 550 <someoneelse>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table; from=<root> to=<someoneelse> proto=SMTP helo=<mail>[09:20:55] <e^ipi> any help ?[09:23:04] *** ^Willie^Laptop has joined #postfix[09:25:28] *** Motoko-chan has quit IRC[09:27:55] *** cutmasta has joined #postfix[09:29:56] *** phnord has joined #postfix[09:39:02] *** christopher__ has joined #postfix[09:39:57] *** christopher__ is now known as christopher_s[09:41:09] *** Jax has quit IRC[09:43:22] *** andres has joined #postfix[09:43:25] <andres> Hi all[09:45:43] <andres> Is there any possibility to use something like check_recipient_access with already "translated" addresses? (translated in the sense that they have gone through virtual_alias_maps or the like)[09:46:05] *** prebur36 has quit IRC[09:57:17] <lucas> does anybody know how I can debug this: /var/log/syslog shows postfix sending an email out to my gmail address. (mailman causes this). the email never arrives.[09:57:22] <lucas> log says to=<lucas.meijer at gmail dot com>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[66.249.83.27]:25, delay=0.98, delays=0.05/0.07/0.18/0.68, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1195721636 i38si2036904wxd)[09:57:51] <lucas> if I telnet to port 25, and pretend I'm a mailclient, and have postfix send an email to the same address, it does arrive.[09:58:06] <lucas> does anybody know how I can find out what exactly it is that postfix is doing?[09:59:04] <sysmonk> did you check the spam folder in gmail?[10:00:52] *** war has joined #postfix[10:01:04] <lucas> sysmonk: yes :([10:01:09] <sysmonk> and?[10:01:10] <sysmonk> not there?[10:01:35] <lucas> nope.[10:01:46] * sysmonk never saw gmail discarding mails[10:02:32] <rmullins> mine was timing out a little bit ago on sending to gmail like the server wasn't responsive.[10:03:12] <lucas> I don't think it's gmail. I suspect it's postfix, since I'm a postfix newbie and just setting it up on a new server... It's defenitely my fault somewhere, just have to figure out where.[10:03:45] <sysmonk> lucas: the log says that gmail has accepted the mail, and the id's look like gmails - so it's not postfix fault[10:04:33] *** prebur has joined #postfix[10:06:21] <lucas> almost at the same time, an email goes out to another address as well. It doesn't arrive there either. (not a gmail address). logs look identical, with the correct smtp server in the log, and status=sent.[10:06:24] <lucas> very weird.[10:07:05] <sysmonk> lucas: you could add my email addie, and i could look if i receive the mail[10:07:18] <lucas> these emails are output from mailman. the strange thing is that if I configure mailman to reject incoming mail, and I have that gmail user send an email, mailman will respond with "your mail has been rejected". and that email does arrive.[10:07:27] <lucas> sysmonk: sure, whats your email?[10:07:47] <sysmonk> lucas: alex at elpastas dot lt[10:08:06] *** Jax has joined #postfix[10:08:07] <sysmonk> just will need to wait for the greylisting[10:09:22] <sysmonk> lucas: btw, what will be the adress you'll be sending from?[10:10:41] <lucas> I think it will be lucas.meijer at gmail dot com, alltough I'm still new to my mailman setup.[10:10:55] <lucas> your mailserver replied saying I should wait 5 minutes for graylisting.[10:11:32] <lucas> it could also be that it comes from villaverde-bounces at shockwaving dot com, which would be a misconfiguration on my part.[10:11:39] <lucas> or villaverde at lists dot shockwaving.com[10:12:18] <sysmonk> strange, it tried the first time with a different EHLO[10:12:23] <sysmonk> proto=ESMTP helo=<mach8>[10:12:33] <lucas> at least this excercise made me showed me I didn't have a fully qualitfied domain name setup. (your mailserver responded that it didn't like that).[10:12:36] <sysmonk> and the second time: proto=ESMTP helo=<shockwaving.com>[10:12:46] <sysmonk> lucas: yeah[10:12:49] <lucas> yeah. that was misconfigured and fixed by me.[10:12:54] <sysmonk> good[10:13:20] *** githogori has quit IRC[10:13:45] <lucas> should I send another one in 5 minutes? unsure how your graylisting feature works.[10:13:55] *** Jax has quit IRC[10:14:05] <e^ipi> anyone willing to take a stab at my aliases problem?[10:15:29] <hans__> do you all have any idea why yahoo keeps deferring emails? I've read their page on email deferrement, but I can't seem to find any obvious reasons[10:15:43] *** Lap_64 has quit IRC[10:16:29] <lucas> a^ipi: I don't see this "somebody" mentioned in any of the two files you pastebinned.[10:17:45] <e^ipi> wrong error, regardless, same thing happens when i attempt to email tech@...[10:17:50] <e^ipi> which is defined[10:18:05] *** prebur has quit IRC[10:18:17] <lucas> tech@.. what is ... ?[10:18:47] <e^ipi> oteonline.com, my domain[10:19:14] *** bh has joined #postfix[10:20:25] <lucas> e^ipi: you can run postfix in verbose mode (http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#verbose), then it will be very explicit on why it does what it does.[10:20:54] <sysmonk> lucas: got it[10:20:55] <lucas> it explains where it is looking to find what etc... it will probably lead you to the cause.[10:21:00] <bh> /quit/quit[10:21:02] *** bh has quit IRC[10:21:05] <lucas> sysmonk: you got the email?[10:21:08] <sysmonk> X-Spam-Score: 3[10:21:09] <sysmonk> X-Spam-Level: ***[10:21:10] <sysmonk> yup[10:21:16] <lucas> what did the subject say?[10:21:44] <sysmonk> [Villaverde] test24[10:22:05] <lucas> wowzers. I'm puzzled.. would it really be both my email addresses that are both not working.[10:22:15] <lucas> just so I know: who was the FROM ?[10:22:33] <sysmonk> From: "Lucas Meijer" <lucas.meijer at gmail dot com>[10:22:34] <sysmonk> To: villaverde at lists dot shockwaving.com[10:22:56] <lucas> I'll be damned. okay, well I guess the good news is that I setup postfix correctly.[10:23:08] <sysmonk> yes[10:23:18] <sysmonk> as i said in the first place :)[10:24:03] <lucas> so now I'll have to figure out why both my regular email, and gmail are both not "displaying" these emails, while postfix displays similar output w.r.t. communication with the correct smtp servers.[10:24:30] <lucas> I'll remove you from the mailing list now, unless you want to be kept up to date with a new school in rural honduras :)[10:24:31] <sysmonk> lucas: i noticed you with my @gmail addie[10:24:40] <sysmonk> try adding it[10:24:43] <sysmonk> and sending another email[10:25:19] <lucas> sysmonk: I don't understand. you mean add sysmonk at gmail.com ?[10:25:20] <sysmonk> oh, and don't remove my @elpastas addie just for now[10:25:27] <sysmonk> lucas: no[10:25:29] <sysmonk> i'll pm you[10:25:57] * sysmonk out for a smoke[10:33:13] *** lasantha1978 has joined #postfix[10:33:22] *** bon has joined #postfix[10:33:37] <lasantha1978> Dear all, can somebody please tell me a good online document for configure mail scanning in clamav for postfix server?[10:34:51] <sysmonk> lucas: i did get the mail again[10:34:55] <sysmonk> to both elpastas and gmail[10:35:02] <sysmonk> but in gmail it's in spam folder, as i supposed[10:35:22] <bon> hi folks, any clue on setting up the .forward-like scenario with virtual users? (that is leaving the mail in the recipient's maildir but _also_ forward it to somewhere else)[10:36:01] <lucas> sysmonk: thanks. I have no clue why my gmail is not getting them, but we've seriously ruled out postfix now.[10:36:13] <sysmonk> bon: virtual_alias_maps/tables/whatever, user at domain dot com user at domain dot com,otheruser@domain.com[10:36:33] <sysmonk> lucas: sure, but i offer you to recheck the spam folder AGAIN ;)[10:36:39] <sysmonk> lucas: oh, and remove both of my addies from the mailman[10:37:29] <bon> sysmonk: that doesnt seem to work for me using mysql virtual users + postfixadmin[10:37:45] <bon> sysmonk: i am able to setup mailbox user at domain dot com but then cannot create alias user at domain dot com[10:37:57] <sysmonk> bon: ain't sure how postfixadmin stores those, but it does work for me, on ALL servers[10:40:44] *** mark-use has joined #postfix[10:41:42] *** PhilKC has quit IRC[10:44:36] <lucas> sysmonk: will remove you. spam folder has 0 messages, since I deleted all spam before sending out the last two tests.[10:45:51] *** lucas is now known as lucas2[10:46:03] *** lucas2 is now known as lucas[10:46:28] *** lucas is now known as ljmeijer[10:47:06] <lasantha1978> Sorry for disturbing discussions, can somebody please tell me a good online document for configure mail scanning in clamav for postfix server?[10:48:36] <f3ew> !amavisd[10:48:37] <knoba> f3ew: Error: "amavisd" is not a valid command.[10:48:38] <f3ew> !amavis[10:48:39] <knoba> f3ew: "amavis" : a mail virus scanner. A content filter that scans all received mail for spam (using the built-in spamassassin) and viruses (using any external virus scanner). See: http://www.amavis.org/[10:48:44] <f3ew> !amavisd-new[10:48:45] <knoba> f3ew: "amavisd-new" : amavisd-new is a high-performance and reliable interface between mailer (MTA) and one or more content checkers. See http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/[10:48:50] <f3ew> See that link[10:51:20] <bon> sysmonk: virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf[10:51:23] <bon> sysmonk: something like this?[10:53:57] *** tarik has joined #postfix[10:58:42] *** canatella has left #postfix[11:00:38] *** ming_zym has quit IRC[11:02:20] <ljmeijer> sysmonk: found the problem: gmail is trying to be smart, and auto-deletes incoming messages from mailinglists that were written by yourself. at least that's what it looks like.[11:02:51] *** ming_zym has joined #postfix[11:12:51] *** brancaleone has joined #postfix[11:24:28] *** ^Willie^Laptop has quit IRC[11:28:58] *** ^Willie^Laptop has joined #postfix[11:31:45] *** ming_zym has quit IRC[11:33:26] *** lasantha1978 has left #postfix[11:34:12] *** marc7 has quit IRC[11:37:48] *** duki has joined #postfix[11:37:49] *** pirho has joined #postfix[11:39:38] *** dbaio has joined #postfix[11:43:22] *** duki has quit IRC[11:45:00] *** stony has joined #postfix[11:46:18] *** ming_zym has joined #postfix[11:46:33] *** VSpike has joined #postfix[11:46:49] *** war has quit IRC[11:47:04] <VSpike> Can I use ssl certs which require a password for TLS?[11:47:24] <VSpike> If so, how do I supply the pass phrase to postfix?[11:48:23] *** imapril has joined #Postfix[11:48:55] *** PhilKC has joined #Postfix[11:48:56] *** imapril has left #Postfix[11:49:27] *** war has joined #postfix[11:51:57] *** Werdna has joined #postfix[11:52:10] <stony> hi[11:55:22] *** duki has joined #postfix[11:56:21] <VSpike> hi stony[12:00:15] *** s0n1 has joined #postfix[12:02:58] <Werdna> hi, where does postfix log to? A bit of googling indicates /var/log/maillog, but that file doesn't exist on my system. I've tried installing a syslog daemon, but that doesn't make it work either.[12:03:18] <R1ck> depends on your configuration[12:03:21] <R1ck> postconf -n[12:03:54] <Werdna> nothing about logging[12:05:09] <R1ck> http://www.postfix.org/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README.html#syslog_howto[12:11:00] *** xored has joined #postfix[12:11:28] <bon> ok so anyone can help me with virtual mappings? ;)[12:12:02] <Werdna> R1ck: thanks. works[12:13:56] <bon> http://openpaste.org/en/4007/[12:14:03] <bon> that is /etc/postfix/virtual[12:14:07] <bon> delivery works fine[12:14:25] <bon> but when sending to multi@ the user1@ gets each mail twice[12:17:12] *** ming_zym has quit IRC[12:19:42] *** ming_zym has joined #postfix[12:32:08] *** duki has quit IRC[12:43:42] *** Twinkletoes has quit IRC[12:48:16] *** duki has joined #postfix[12:51:05] *** s0n1 has quit IRC[12:56:01] <VSpike> Is it worth running postfix chrooted with sasl when incoming mail is coming via fetchmail and only local network (NAT) or authenticated clients are allowed to relay outgoing?[12:56:13] <VSpike> In otherwords, can I forget about the chroot?[12:56:33] <VSpike> I can't get it to connect to saslauthd properly[12:57:40] <f3ew> ignore the chroot[12:59:43] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[13:00:24] <VSpike> It's annoying - I'm sure this *should* be working[13:00:38] <VSpike> I keep getting "warning: SASL authentication failure: cannot connect to saslauthd server: No such file or directory"[13:00:59] <VSpike> Yet i have files in /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd/[13:01:13] *** e^ipi has quit IRC[13:01:32] <VSpike> I'm not sure the perms there are correct though[13:01:42] <VSpike> I've added postfix to the sasl group[13:03:08] *** pAvL0 has joined #postfix[13:03:09] <pAvL0> Hi[13:03:32] <pAvL0> How could I send a mail to all the users of my mail server?[13:03:46] <VSpike> I'm assuming that /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd/mux is the executable?[13:04:05] <pAvL0> the only one option is to set up an alias?[13:04:14] <VSpike> If I su to user "postfix" and try to execute it, I get "permission denied"[13:05:01] <pAvL0> but everytime I create a new user i need to modify this alias...[13:05:05] <VSpike> The file is srwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2007-11-22 11:59 mux[13:05:45] <VSpike> Aw to hell with it - I'll try it without the chroot[13:06:12] *** meandtheshell has joined #postfix[13:06:41] <VSpike> oh.. heh[13:06:52] <VSpike> That's the problem - I'm not running smtpd chroot :)[13:07:01] <VSpike> That would explain why it can't find anything[13:07:05] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[13:07:53] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[13:10:54] *** brancaleone has quit IRC[13:14:01] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[13:15:58] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[13:24:17] <VSpike> ah.. working finally :)[13:25:02] <VSpike> Could someone do me a favour and test if the smtp server at carlyleclarke.plus.com is properly closed?[13:25:09] <VSpike> I'd really appreciate the sanity check[13:25:11] *** prebur has joined #postfix[13:25:35] <VSpike> Alternatively I can pastebin my main.cf[13:27:16] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[13:29:39] *** Tjikkun_work has joined #postfix[13:31:34] *** bhagat has quit IRC[13:35:22] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[13:35:33] *** andres has quit IRC[13:35:33] *** adam33 has joined #postfix[13:40:54] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[13:44:44] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[13:45:35] <VSpike> Used this instead http://www.abuse.net/relay.html[13:45:42] <VSpike> bye![13:45:44] *** VSpike has left #postfix[13:46:17] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[13:57:42] *** dec has joined #postfix[13:58:59] *** ming_zym has quit IRC[14:00:14] *** asmas has quit IRC[14:08:12] *** brancaleone has joined #postfix[14:22:55] *** speedy has joined #postfix[14:23:39] <speedy> my mail server is taking long time to respond to "RCPT TO:" command[14:23:55] <sep> speedy, dns timeout on the reverse lookup ?[14:24:58] <speedy> postfix/smtpd[17754]: warning: timeout on private/policy while reading input attribute name[14:25:13] <speedy> thats for spf[14:25:50] *** lambda has joined #postfix[14:25:51] <speedy> thats when i grep for timeout[14:26:16] <speedy> or rbl?[14:26:30] *** Zelest has joined #postfix[14:26:40] <speedy> i'm processing lots of emails[14:28:08] *** Tjikkun_work has quit IRC[14:28:46] *** row has quit IRC[14:31:58] *** Joelwork has quit IRC[14:33:06] *** robboplus has joined #postfix[14:41:54] *** pirho has quit IRC[14:45:44] *** pitakill has quit IRC[14:46:41] *** bh has joined #postfix[14:47:49] *** robboplus_ has quit IRC[14:52:02] *** pirho has joined #postfix[14:52:55] *** pirho has quit IRC[14:54:48] *** duki has left #postfix[14:56:11] *** pAvL0 has quit IRC[14:57:00] *** harobed has joined #postfix[15:01:07] *** pirho has joined #postfix[15:04:12] *** bh has quit IRC[15:07:46] *** brancaleone has quit IRC[15:07:56] *** ayeuu has joined #postfix[15:10:01] <ayeuu> hi there, I'll need help about header_checks please, is it possible to match headers with a "from" and a "to" then reject it ?[15:10:24] <sysmonk> no[15:10:37] <sysmonk> unless you'll write a policy daemon/script/whatever[15:10:50] <ayeuu> hum, ok, thx[15:10:52] <sysmonk> postfix can match on ONE of those two, but not on both at the same time[15:10:53] <rob0> A single header, with both from and to? How odd.[15:11:27] <sysmonk> rob0: never saw one ? it has a \n somewhere in the middle[15:11:30] <sysmonk> :P[15:11:41] <rob0> ah :)[15:12:34] <rob0> It's wrong to manipulate / redirect mail based on headers anyway. Use envelope addresses.[15:15:16] *** unixcoder has joined #postfix[15:19:09] *** wsxws has joined #postfix[15:19:13] <wsxws> hi there :)[15:19:16] <wsxws> X-Postfix; mail for server01.kupp-services.de loops back to[15:19:16] <wsxws> myself[15:19:23] <wsxws> ops, sorry[15:19:36] *** pirho_ has joined #postfix[15:20:04] <wsxws> X-Postfix; mail for server01.kupp-services.de loops back to myself <<-- what does that mean ?[15:21:11] *** pirho has quit IRC[15:21:29] *** unixipher has joined #postfix[15:23:40] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[15:23:42] *** pirho_ has quit IRC[15:24:06] * Sweeper sneds the guard off for beer & primo[15:24:46] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[15:24:49] *** pirho has joined #postfix[15:25:00] *** mark-use has quit IRC[15:28:57] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[15:31:24] *** tarik has quit IRC[15:32:10] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[15:33:44] *** Lars_G has joined #postfix[15:34:00] <Lars_G> Is majordomo still the top player? or is there anything better you'd suggest me to use?[15:34:10] <sysmonk> mailman ?[15:34:40] <sysmonk> ( i don't use any personally, but afaik majordomo isn't "developed" anymore, but mailman is)[15:36:49] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[15:38:39] *** tarik has joined #postfix[15:42:23] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[15:44:52] <wsxws> what was the command to check the dns of an mx record again ?[15:47:09] *** lambda has quit IRC[15:47:44] *** Tinozaure is now known as _Tino[15:48:48] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[15:56:22] <Lars_G> wsxws: you mean the ip of the MX record?[16:02:20] *** oates|AFK has quit IRC[16:04:11] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[16:04:52] <wsxws> i forgot the command where i can check the setting of the mx[16:05:01] <wsxws> whe i can c the p and the priority[16:05:07] <wsxws> p = ip[16:05:39] *** shinao1 has joined #postfix[16:05:52] <wsxws> Lars_G ?[16:05:52] <Lars_G> not sure bout priority but try "host -t MX domain.com"[16:05:57] <wsxws> ah[16:05:59] <wsxws> yes[16:06:02] <wsxws> thanks[16:07:33] <wsxws> that shows the priority but not the ip :P[16:08:35] <Lars_G> then simply do a "host mail.domain.com" for the address it gave[16:08:59] <Lars_G> or use "host -v -t MX domain.com"[16:09:04] <wsxws> i just did, i simply thought there was a single command for the full details[16:09:16] <sysmonk> dig it is[16:09:45] <sysmonk> if it returns additional sections ofcorse[16:09:49] <wsxws> yeah, thats the command i forgot[16:09:58] <Lars_G> dig or host -v works too[16:12:02] <wsxws> okies, that entries are all fine and i can send email, but i cant recieve them[16:12:09] <wsxws> i always get X-Postfix; mail for server01.kupp-services.de loops back to myself[16:12:27] <Lars_G> wsxws: you've not defined the domain as a local drop in postfix[16:12:36] <Lars_G> so it's trying to deliver it to destination which is itself[16:12:43] <Lars_G> you need to tell postfix the domain is to be delivered locally[16:12:56] <wsxws> where do i do that ?[16:13:00] <sysmonk> or virtually...[16:13:01] <sysmonk> ;)[16:14:52] <wsxws> is it the mydestination entry ?[16:15:11] <Lars_G> main.cf if you're not using virtual mail, just add your domain to mydestination[16:15:12] <Lars_G> yup[16:15:41] <wsxws> thats a prob, that has a mysqlentry[16:15:48] <wsxws> and the recieverdomain is in there[16:16:01] <wsxws> mydestination = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-mydestination.cf[16:17:43] <Lars_G> that means it's checking in a mysql database, check the domain exists in the database refered there[16:18:47] <wsxws> it does, there is only one domain atm[16:19:33] *** lambda has joined #postfix[16:19:50] <wsxws> at least it works when i put $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain behind the mysql-entry[16:20:08] <wsxws> i just wnader if i wil work with other domains lateron too[16:22:15] *** harobed has quit IRC[16:24:25] *** Jax has joined #postfix[16:24:28] <Jax> hey guys[16:27:59] <Jax> f3ew ![16:28:32] <Jax> do you know where i could find out what POP3's "Leave copy on server" actually does so the client doesn't download it twice?[16:30:40] <lennard> its kinda client-related and not postfix-related... but the client locally keeps a list of UUID's it has already downloaded[16:30:57] *** e^ipi has joined #postfix[16:31:06] <Jax> hm because i copied the mails via rsync to a new server[16:31:10] <Jax> and the client downloaded them again[16:31:14] <Jax> that was kinda dumb...[16:34:52] *** cutmasta has quit IRC[16:35:12] *** e^ipi has quit IRC[16:38:43] *** carl- has joined #postfix[16:51:41] <lambda> !reject_unlisted_sender[16:51:42] <knoba> lambda: Error: "reject_unlisted_sender" is not a valid command.[16:51:50] <lambda> !reject_unlisted_senders[16:51:51] <knoba> lambda: Error: "reject_unlisted_senders" is not a valid command.[16:57:17] *** rootsvr has joined #postfix[16:57:51] *** speedy has quit IRC[17:03:06] *** Jax has quit IRC[17:04:22] *** debuggerboy has joined #postfix[17:05:43] *** ^Willie^Laptop has quit IRC[17:05:48] <debuggerboy> Is there any problem if I use both DNSBL and SPAMASSASSIN togather in POSTFIX? (some websites say that spamassassin does the work od DNSBL - But I am unsure) Any idea?[17:06:20] <debuggerboy> correction : "the work of DNSBL"[17:10:07] <wsxws> hm[17:10:37] <wsxws> when i try to install nntp (or inn) i alwas get adress already in use, what could that be ?[17:12:40] *** madclicker has quit IRC[17:14:53] <rob0> Just be careful, know your dnsbl's. If any doubt, only use Zen with reject_rbl_client ...[17:14:56] <rob0> !zen[17:14:57] <knoba> rob0: "zen" : http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/ : A composite of all Spamhaus DNSBLs: SBL, XBL and PBL[17:15:39] <rob0> It will save you a lot of bandwidth and processing power, to reject those at SMTP time, rather than in post-queue content filtering.[17:16:28] <rob0> DNSBL support in SA is a bit of a kludge, going by what it sees in the headers.[17:16:42] *** madclicker has joined #postfix[17:16:51] <rob0> But, it's the best way to use less-safe RBLs like Spamcop.[17:18:09] <debuggerboy> Iam using ZEN already with other BL's like spamco etc[17:18:15] <debuggerboy> both togather...[17:18:58] <debuggerboy> Now Iam planning to add Spamassassin support to the postfix mailserver ( I m getting tonnes of spam each day )[17:21:33] <rob0> using HELO checks? That takes out a lot of zombie spew.[17:22:12] *** unixipher has quit IRC[17:22:13] <rob0> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, reject_invalid_helo_hostname[17:23:21] <debuggerboy> rob0, I would like to reject the mails with failed reverse lookups? is there any way?[17:23:24] <tm-30740-exa> be careful : lots of valid mail server run by SME do not have valid HELO[17:23:41] <tm-30740-exa> it remove lots of junk (and a few legitimate as well)[17:23:45] <rob0> SME?[17:23:47] *** capt-rogers has joined #postfix[17:23:53] <tm-30740-exa> Small Medium Enterprise[17:24:14] <rob0> Note, I didn't say to use reject_unknown_helo_hostname[17:24:18] <tm-30740-exa> Same as SOHO : Small office Home Office[17:25:23] <debuggerboy> yeah, (me an SME) I have 2 sendmails servs running with out proper IP-reverse valuse. Other mailserver reject my mails due to that, Iam in the process of correcting my reverse, but that will hav to be done by my UPsteam service provider.[17:25:40] <rob0> reject_unknown_helo_hostname is what would get the ones tm-30740-exa mentions. They usually send "valid" and FQDN HELOs.[17:25:55] <rob0> (they're just names that aren't in the DNS.)[17:27:46] *** solar345 has joined #postfix[17:27:47] <Roobarb-Work> is there any way to tell that a client authenticated when they connected to port 25 ?[17:29:56] <rob0> Well, you would permit_sasl_authenticated and then reject_unauth_destination[17:30:44] *** rootsvr has quit IRC[17:30:53] <Roobarb-Work> rob0: I have that.[17:31:28] <Roobarb-Work> I'm getting reports (and seeing in my logs) of clients being denied relay access when trying to send mail to other domains[17:31:46] <Roobarb-Work> I'm trying to work out if its because they're not authenticating[17:32:07] <rob0> They're probably using MS clients, not authenticating even tho they have been configured to do so.[17:32:09] *** rikur has quit IRC[17:32:14] *** unixcoder has quit IRC[17:32:37] <Roobarb-Work> rob0: hence my question: how to you tell if they are or not?[17:32:50] <rob0> if they're rejected, they did not AUTH. :)[17:32:57] <Roobarb-Work> :P[17:33:21] <rob0> and I probably know the fix[17:33:56] <Roobarb-Work> well, I'm seeing "auth success" lines in my auth.log, from saslauthd, for other users so I guess not being authenticated is indeed the sisue[17:34:02] <rob0> best fix: tell your users to call MS support for MS trashware. ;)[17:34:06] <Roobarb-Work> heh[17:34:18] <rob0> That could be for IMAP[17:34:29] <rob0> oh[17:34:42] <Roobarb-Work> its saying service=smtp[17:34:52] <rob0> What auth mechanisms are you offering?[17:35:13] <Roobarb-Work> imap logs into my mai logs[17:35:15] <Roobarb-Work> *mail[17:35:37] <Roobarb-Work> 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN[17:35:37] <Roobarb-Work> 250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN[17:35:49] <rob0> shucks[17:36:07] <Roobarb-Work> I'll bet said user has been fiddling[17:36:20] <rob0> Maybe if you changed it to LOGIN PLAIN, but that's a longshot :([17:36:51] <rob0> MS trashware can't do PLAIN but it can do LOGIN.[17:37:04] *** solar_ant has quit IRC[17:37:08] <Roobarb-Work> its been this way for years[17:37:10] *** solar345 is now known as solar_ant[17:37:17] *** solar__ has joined #postfix[17:37:20] <Roobarb-Work> so its a PEBCAK issue, not server-side[17:37:24] <rob0> Yup, probably user error, turned off auth.[17:37:59] *** sepski has joined #postfix[17:38:08] <rob0> a lot of .edu sites have screenshots of how to tell MS clients to AUTH. Google those, send to luser.[17:38:35] <Roobarb-Work> they should know this anyway[17:39:13] * Roobarb-Work updates the support ticket with something polite[17:39:57] <rob0> Did you correlate the auth log with the mail log?[17:40:11] <rob0> that's probably how to show a lack of auth.[17:41:14] <rob0> There should be an auth logged somewhere between the smtpd client connection and rejection.[17:41:30] <rob0> (cronologically between)[17:42:03] <Roobarb-Work> not a sausage for hours either side of the mail logs[17:42:29] <Roobarb-Work> ergo, no auth[17:42:45] *** GoGi has joined #postfix[17:43:04] * Roobarb-Work considers logining sasl auth logs into his mail logs for correlation purposes[17:44:20] *** amrit|bbl is now known as amrit[17:44:29] <rob0> But, other users, find another auth'ed relay ...[17:47:13] *** adam33 has quit IRC[17:49:53] *** rikur has joined #postfix[17:53:33] *** phnord has quit IRC[17:56:35] *** wsxws has quit IRC[17:56:45] *** zez_zez has quit IRC[17:57:57] *** Moofius_ has joined #postfix[17:58:17] <Moofius_> Hi there, how to test if a mailserver is online on localhost?[18:01:19] *** tm-30740-exa has quit IRC[18:01:29] *** j_s has joined #postfix[18:07:56] *** Moofius_ has left #postfix[18:11:27] *** sepski has quit IRC[18:12:26] *** solar_ant has quit IRC[18:13:19] *** lambda has quit IRC[18:18:32] <adaptr> netstat -plant | grep 25[18:24:02] *** unics has joined #postfix[18:24:55] *** shinao1 has quit IRC[18:25:13] *** solar_ant has joined #postfix[18:35:53] *** djs_2_6 has joined #postfix[18:42:01] *** rootsvr has joined #postfix[18:53:20] *** havvg has joined #postfix[18:54:36] *** hparker has joined #postfix[18:56:58] *** lambda has joined #postfix[18:57:57] *** context has joined #postfix[18:58:20] <context> why is postfix accepting mail for postmaster@mydestination but refusing to forward mail for root@mydestination[18:58:25] <context> the alias is setup properly[18:59:21] <adaptr> because postfix will always accept mail for postmaster - it is RFC mandatory to do so[18:59:44] <context> its forwarding mail for postmaster properly[19:00:07] *** Lars_G has left #postfix[19:01:12] <adaptr> not enough information[19:01:27] <context> adaptr: i have aliases setup.. in /etc/mail/aliases[19:01:37] <adaptr> what is in your aliases file ? is it being used at all ? how is it being used ? do you have local domains, or virtual ones, or none[19:01:40] <context> when i change them, postmaster goes where its suppose to[19:04:09] <context> i have just the hostname and local.$domain and localhost in mydestination[19:04:12] <context> i do have virtual[19:04:17] <context> virtual mail gets sent fine[19:04:41] <context> i changed postmaster from a local to virtual user and /etc/mail/aliases and it sent to the local user fine, and it sent to the virtual user file[19:04:57] <context> it does not send to root@ or abuse@ though which forward to the same person as postmaster[19:05:11] <adaptr> you're skipping too many steps[19:05:22] <context> ok?[19:05:34] <adaptr> no, not ok[19:05:50] <adaptr> *how* have you set up your virtual domains, and what kind of aliasing are you using for them ?[19:06:05] <adaptr> does re-aliasing root to a virtual domain make it fall into another class ?[19:06:08] *** oxy-102 has joined #postfix[19:06:12] <oxy-102> WRAARRRR!!! I'm the Tomato Monstahhhhh! WRAARRRR!!![19:06:16] <oxy-102> WRAARRRR!!! I has the Cookies Tooo! WRAARRRR!!![19:06:19] <context> its all through postgresql[19:06:20] <adaptr> a virtual domain does not normally have a root address[19:06:20] <oxy-102> WRAARRRR!!! I'm the Tomato Monstahhhhh! WRAARRRR!!![19:06:31] *** oxy-102 has left #postfix[19:06:34] <adaptr> context that is not helpful, I'm afraid[19:06:41] <context> adaptr: i just said postmaster aliases to the SAME virtual user i have for root[19:06:56] <adaptr> it tells me nothing without extensive config and logs[19:06:57] <context> adaptr: /etc/mail/aliases: postmaster: context[19:07:02] <context> sends to the local user context[19:07:04] <adaptr> how am I to intuit what is going wrong ?[19:07:11] <context> i change it to postmaster: context at virtu dot domain[19:07:17] <context> it sends mail to the virtual user[19:07:25] <context> root log says:[19:07:56] <context> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 550 5.1.1 <root at coma dot plastik.us>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table;[19:08:45] <adaptr> that is your clue[19:08:56] <adaptr> LOCAL recipient table[19:09:01] <adaptr> it is never considered to be virtual[19:09:13] <rob0> !unknown_local[19:09:13] <knoba> rob0: "unknown_local" : User unknown in local recipient table means that the recipient domain was found in $mydestination but the username was not found in local_recipient_maps (by default: users in /etc/passwd and aliases(5) in /etc/aliases).[19:09:57] <context> thnx[19:11:23] <context> so your saying root in /etc/mail/aliases really isnt enough[19:11:34] <context> but for postmaster it is[19:11:59] <rob0> "postconf -n" at a pastebin[19:12:00] <context> last i checked i still have a root in /etc/passwd as well[19:12:04] <context> kk[19:13:08] <context> actually[19:13:11] <context> i think: local_recipient_maps = $virtual_mailbox_maps[19:13:14] <context> would be it[19:13:17] <context> or does that add ?[19:13:34] <context> http://rafb.net/p/cqljXK35.html[19:14:40] <context> <- fail[19:15:28] <rob0> Well indeed, you cannot do that.[19:15:55] <rob0> local_recipient_maps is a different format.[19:16:36] <context> it works[19:16:45] <rob0> ?[19:16:48] <context> i added $alias_maps before it[19:16:51] <context> and it sends now[19:17:17] <context> rob0: http://www.postfix.org/LOCAL_RECIPIENT_README.html shows it that way as well[19:18:28] <rob0> where?[19:18:39] <context> When you need to change the local_recipient_maps setting in main.cf[19:19:07] <rob0> but that set local_transport = virtual[19:19:30] <rob0> you cannot PARTLY follow instructions and expect things to work.[19:19:37] <context> ...[19:19:47] <context> i go t it wokring, srry for taking your time[19:26:58] *** debuggerboy has quit IRC[19:39:43] *** unixcoder has joined #postfix[19:47:45] *** blahdeblah has joined #postfix[19:47:57] <blahdeblah> What does *this* mean?!? "postmap: pausing to let /etc/postfix/main.cf cool down"[19:48:03] <blahdeblah> Google has 0 hits![19:48:28] <Zelest> lol[19:48:35] <Zelest> that looks rather interesting tbh ;)[19:49:06] <blahdeblah> Yeah - i almost did Laugh Out Loud. :-)[19:50:34] *** Kalavera has joined #postfix[19:50:36] <Kalavera> hi guys[19:50:39] <adaptr> postmap queries any databases you have[19:50:46] <adaptr> so it probably dies or times out[19:50:47] <Kalavera> I see this error on my postfix log[19:51:08] <Kalavera> Temporary lookup failure (in reply to RCPT TO command))[19:51:08] <blahdeblah> adaptr: times out on what?!? All i was doing was rebuilding virtual.db.[19:51:10] <Kalavera> any idea?[19:51:22] <adaptr> blahdeblah ah, which contains ?[19:51:57] <blahdeblah> adaptr: Not much different to what it did before i rebuilt it - i added one line.[19:52:14] <adaptr> Kalavera it means that either your box doesn't understand DNS, or the sender domain doesn't exist[19:52:37] *** ayeuu has quit IRC[19:53:20] *** pirho has quit IRC[19:55:09] *** matiu has quit IRC[19:55:45] <shasta> Results 1 - 10 of about 21,900 for postfix pausing to let cool down. (0.14 seconds)[19:57:32] <blahdeblah> shasta: Google mustn't like me today[19:57:55] <blahdeblah> Results 1 - 10 of about 17 for postmap: pausing to let /etc/postfix/main.cf cool down with Safesearch on. (0.07 seconds)[19:58:00] <blahdeblah> And none of them actually contain the message[19:59:44] *** ejovrh has quit IRC[20:00:04] *** ejovrh has joined #postfix[20:00:13] <Kalavera> wait[20:00:35] <blahdeblah> shasta: When i use your search string, i get:[20:00:35] <blahdeblah> Results 1 - 10 of about 41 for postmap pausing to let cool down with Safesearch on. (0.30 seconds)[20:00:45] <blahdeblah> And still none of them contains the actual message[20:00:58] *** hemry has joined #postfix[20:01:01] <shasta> touch /etc/postfix/main.cf; postfix reload[20:02:05] <blahdeblah> So what does that do? And why the strange message? I would have expected that i would at least get a hit on the source code where that message appears[20:12:42] <shasta> if you'd search like I shown, you'd get a hit[20:19:13] *** stony has quit IRC[20:21:16] *** EB_ has joined #postfix[20:21:37] *** carl- has quit IRC[20:22:23] <Kalavera> adaptr: My box is at DMZ zone, my dns server is at dmz zone and I don't have problems with names resolution[20:22:35] <Kalavera> I can post some tests[20:22:48] <rob0> src/util/dict.c: msg_info("pausing to let %s cool down", path);[20:22:50] <rob0> src/util/load_file.c: msg_info("pausing to let %s cool down", path);[20:23:17] <Kalavera> heya rob0[20:23:29] <EB_> Hii All I know this channel isnt right place but I asked on spamasssin channel nobody hasnt answer to me may be you help I am using sa on postfix I run sa-update but sa spam catch ratio is lowering ay by day[20:23:48] <EB_> I have to make something after sa-update[20:23:51] <EB_> ?[20:26:40] <Kalavera> adaptr: snape ~ # ping www.yahoo.com[20:26:40] <Kalavera> PING www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net (69.147.114.210) 56(84) bytes of data.[20:29:05] *** EB_ has quit IRC[20:31:08] *** E_B_ has joined #postfix[20:31:44] *** E_B_ has quit IRC[20:32:02] *** EE_BB has joined #postfix[20:34:41] <Kalavera> adaptr: Can be an slave server failure, I have on my parent servers two dns servers registered but only one can response[20:35:37] <EE_BB> Hii All I know this channel isnt right place but I asked on spamasssin channel nobody hasnt answer to me may be you help I am using sa on postfix I run sa-update but sa spam catch ratio is lowering ay by day[20:35:40] <rob0> If you're having DNS problems, use DNS diagnostic tools like dig(1) ... ping doesn't help.[20:36:02] <EE_BB> I have to make something after sa-update[20:36:04] <EE_BB> ?[20:41:39] *** rootsvr has quit IRC[20:45:18] *** tarik has quit IRC[20:47:16] *** tarik_ has joined #postfix[20:47:47] *** tarik_ is now known as tarik[21:00:38] *** pitakill has joined #postfix[21:00:45] *** EE_BB has quit IRC[21:02:07] *** nitbix_ is now known as nitbix[21:05:17] <adaptr> Kalavera that's not what I said[21:20:49] *** Zeit|awy_ has joined #postfix[21:22:04] *** havvg_ has joined #postfix[21:22:09] *** havvg has quit IRC[21:28:12] *** Zeit|awy has quit IRC[21:31:15] *** meandtheshell has quit IRC[21:36:39] *** pitakill has quit IRC[22:00:27] *** diveli has joined #postfix[22:07:59] *** havvg_ has quit IRC[22:12:28] *** unixcoder has quit IRC[22:13:50] *** rootsvr has joined #postfix[22:13:58] *** duki has joined #postfix[22:26:00] *** pitakill has joined #postfix[22:26:30] *** rmullins has quit IRC[22:37:50] *** capt-rogers has quit IRC[22:39:56] *** Zeit|awy_ has quit IRC[22:44:11] *** tarik has quit IRC[22:44:51] *** githogori has joined #postfix[22:47:44] *** pitakill_ has joined #postfix[22:48:28] *** hemry has quit IRC[22:49:18] *** rootsvr has quit IRC[22:50:47] *** Gibbonz has quit IRC[23:07:31] *** rootsvr has joined #postfix[23:26:25] *** pitakill_ has quit IRC[23:26:52] *** pitakill_ has joined #postfix[23:55:06] *** j_s has quit IRC